Capitalism's failed billionaire experiment of Jeffrey Epstein was born out of networked mental illness and has turned into privatized socialism, and they are driving the 6th mass extinction of life on Earth.

"Hoarding disorder is characterized by an ongoing resistance to discarding one’s belongings, even those with no value, like junk mail, old newspapers, and materials that most people would consider to be garbage. Hoarders also hold on to personal possessions that they no longer use, either because they feel emotionally attached to these items or because they believe they will need them in the future.

People with this condition may give in to the urge to acquire excessive amounts of objects that fill up their living space. The accumulation of clutter and lack of order and cleanliness can cause health and safety risks within the home, but discarding items may cause the hoarder to feel significant distress. In this way, hoarding disorder can create social, professional, and functional problems that affect not only the individual but also the people around them.

According to DSM-5, the following symptoms are diagnostic of hoarding disorder:

• There is a persistent difficulty discarding or parting with possessions, regardless of their value or lack thereof.
• The difficulty in discarding possessions is due to distress associated with getting rid of them.
• The difficulty in discarding possessions leads to the clutter of living spaces and compromises the use of living spaces.
• The hoarding creates clinically significant distress or impairment in functioning, including the ability to maintain a safe space.

In some cases, the difficulty in discarding items is accompanied by excessive acquisition of items that are not needed or for which there is no available space.

A hoarder may be completely convinced that the hoarding-related activity—difficulty discarding items, excessive acquisition of items—is not problematic despite evidence to the contrary."

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/conditions/hoarding-disorder

Accordingly, there is little doubt that capitalism's failed billionaire experiment is an advanced and serious type of hoarding by an individual and/or networked individuals, who acquire more assets than they need or can use, and in a manner that harms them and/or other people, and where those affected by this disease or disorder do not think their hoarding is problematic despite evidence to the contrary.

Similarly, capitalism's failed billionaire experiment of Jeffrey Epstein-turned-privatized-socialists present persistent difficulty discarding or parting with assets, regardless of their value, and they have difficulty discarding assets due to the distress associated with getting rid of their excessive assets, and their difficulty in discarding possessions leads to the clutter of living spaces and compromises the use of living spaces.

Let's further explore this last point. Since Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump was "engineered" into office (per the 11/03/2015 emails between Felix Sater and Michael Cohen)  by way of disqualifying treason and elections/voting fraud with Russia in 2016 -- stealing the government thereafter by usurping public offices Trump and the GOP had disqualified themselves for -- 8 billionaires, many linked to Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate of clients, financiers, and associates, now own half of the wealth on Earth per Oxfam.

https://www.gq.com/story/trump-russia-associate-our-boy-can-become-president

"Eight men own the same wealth as the 3.6 billion people who make up the poorest half of humanity, according to a new report published by Oxfam today to mark the annual meeting of political and business leaders in Davos.

Oxfam’s report, ‘An economy for the 99 percent’, shows that the gap between rich and poor is far greater than had been feared. It details how big business and the super-rich are fuelling the inequality crisis by dodging taxes, driving down wages and using their power to influence politics. It calls for a fundamental change in the way we manage our economies so that they work for all people, and not just a fortunate few. 

New and better data on the distribution of global wealth – particularly in India and China – indicates that the poorest half of the world has less wealth than had been previously thought.  Had this new data been available last year, it would have shown that nine billionaires owned the same wealth as the poorest half of the planet, and not 62, as Oxfam calculated at the time.
Winnie Byanyima, Executive Director of Oxfam International, said:

“It is obscene for so much wealth to be held in the hands of so few when 1 in 10 people survive on less than $2 a day.  Inequality is trapping hundreds of millions in poverty; it is fracturing our societies and undermining democracy.  

“Across the world, people are being left behind. Their wages are stagnating yet corporate bosses take home million dollar bonuses; their health and education services are cut while corporations and the super-rich dodge their taxes; their voices are ignored as governments sing to the tune of big business and a wealthy elite.”
Oxfam’s report shows how our broken economies are funneling wealth to a rich elite at the expense of the poorest in society, the majority of whom are women. The richest are accumulating wealth at such an astonishing rate that the world could see its first trillionaire in just 25 years.  To put this figure in perspective – you would need to spend $1 million every day for 2738 years to spend $1 trillion.   

Public anger with inequality is already creating political shockwaves across the globe. Inequality has been cited as a significant factor in the election of Donald Trump in the US, the election of President Duterte in the Philippines, and Brexit in the UK.  
Seven out of 10 people live in a country that has seen a rise in inequality in the last 30 years.  Between 1988 and 2011 the incomes of the poorest 10 percent increased by just $65 per person, while the incomes of the richest 1 percent grew by $11,800 per person – 182 times as much. 

Women, who are often employed in low pay sectors, face high levels of discrimination in the work place, and who take on a disproportionate amount of unpaid care work often find themselves at the bottom of the pile.  On current trends it will take 170 years for women to be paid the same as men.

‘An Economy for the 99 percent’ also reveals how big business and the super-rich are fuelling the inequality crisis.  It shows how, in order to maximize returns to their wealthy shareholders, big corporations are dodging taxes, driving down wages for their workers and the prices paid to producers, and investing less in their business.

Oxfam interviewed women working in a garment factory in Vietnam who work 12 hours a day, 6 days a week and still struggle to get by on the $1 an hour they earn producing clothes for some of the world’s biggest fashion brands. The CEOs of these companies are some of the highest paid people in the world.   Corporate tax dodging costs poor countries at least $100 billion every year. This is enough money to provide an education for the 124 million children who aren’t in school and fund healthcare interventions that could prevent the deaths of at least six million children every year.

The report outlines how the super-rich use a network of tax havens to avoid paying their fair share of tax and an army of wealth managers to secure returns on their investments that would not be available to ordinary savers.  Contrary to popular belief, many of the super-rich are not ‘self-made’. Oxfam analysis shows over half the world’s billionaires either inherited their wealth or accumulated it through industries which are prone to corruption and cronyism. 
It also demonstrates how big business and the super-rich use their money and connections to ensure government policy works for them. For example, billionaires in Brazil have sought to influence elections and successfully lobbied for a reduction in tax bills while oil corporations in Nigeria have managed to secure generous tax breaks.

Byanyima said: “The millions of people who have been left behind by our broken economies need solutions, not scapegoats. That is why Oxfam is setting out a new common sense approach to managing our economies so that they work for the majority and not just the fortunate few.”
“Governments are not helpless in the face of technological change and market forces.  If politicians stop obsessing with GDP, and focus on delivering for all their citizens and not just a wealthy few, a better future is possible for everyone.”
Oxfam’s blueprint for a more human economy includes: 

Governments end the extreme concentration of wealth to end poverty. Governments should increase taxes on both wealth and high incomes to ensure a more level playing field, and to generate funds needed to invest in healthcare, education and job creation.

Governments cooperate rather than just compete. Governments should work together to ensure workers are paid a decent wage, and to put a stop to tax dodging and the race to the bottom on corporate tax. 

Governments support companies that benefit their workers and society rather than just their shareholders. The multi-billion Euro company Mondragon, is owned by its 74,000 strong workforce.  All employees receive a decent wage because its pay structure ensures that the highest paid member of staff earns no more than 9 times the amount of the lowest paid.

Governments ensure economies work for women. They must help to dismantle the barriers to women’s economic progress such as access to education and the unfair burden of unpaid care work.

Oxfam is also calling on business leaders to play their part in building a human economy. The World Economic Forum has responsive and responsible leadership as its key theme this year.  They can make a start by committing to pay their fair share of tax and by ensuring their businesses pay a living wage.  People around the global can also join the campaign at www.evenitup.org."

https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/just-8-men-own-same-wealth-half-world

 Returning to the definition of hoarding, with 8 billionaires owning half of the wealth on Earth, and 2000 to 10000 billionaires lying in wait for the other half, and as it took these 8 billionaires a few decades at most to hoard this amount of assets they don't need and can't use, how long will it take the other 2000 to 10000 billionaires lying in wait to own the other half? Less than a few decades is a reasonable inference.

Except, the world's population continues to explode exponentially, even if that exponential grow is expected to slow, which means that more and more people will need more and more space. Except, billionaires own most of that space. 

Per our insider at the Bohemian Club (the evil layer of the GOP's criminal ruling elite per our previous reporting) in California -- who asked the Forbes family why some billionaires like (Privilegium maius-forged) royals, their Wildenstein "godfather", dictators, and/or other sociopaths don't appear on the world's richest people list -- the response was that their wealth could not be verified, which is another way of saying no one is allowed to know how much money or assets they have hoarded.

Returning, if the Earth has a finite amount of land that can be owned (about 30% of the Earth protrudes land, and the rest is water) and capitalism's failed billionaire experiment of Jeffrey Epstein owns at least half of the same, and couple that to 8 billion people who need a place to live, exponentially growing, and the result is the  billionaire's privatized socialism's "difficulty in discarding possessions leads to the clutter of living spaces and compromises the use of living spaces".

Said differently, the more space the billionaires own, the less the 99.999% of humanity owns, in a manner that results in the clutter of living spaces and compromises the use of living spaces, as is evident by now rampant homelessness across the United States, fueling by inflation, but keeping wages more or less flat but rising, equals economic slavery of the 99.9999% by 8 to 10,000 billionaires, the 0.0001%.

This privatized socialism's runaway hoarding, "creates clinically significant distress or impairment in functioning, including the ability to maintain a safe space. In some cases, the difficulty in discarding items is accompanied by excessive acquisition of items that are not needed or for which there is no available space."

Accordingly, there can be little to no doubt that this privatized socialism attacking the U.S. Constitution and the altruistic teachings of Jesus Christ is born out of an advanced stage of malignant and networked (privatized socialism) hoarding.

The fact that Jeffrey Epstein's failed billionaire experiment share resources with one another in order to hoard more is the evidence of their privatized socialism, for example, but not limited to, Jeffrey Epstein's Saudis financing Jeffrey Epstein's Musk's X, who financed Jeffrey Epstein's Trump, who used Jeffrey Epstein's Rupert Murdoch's Fox News, and Jeffrey Epstein's Steve Bannon's Breitbart, and Jeffrey Epstein's Bill Gates' Microsoft, and Jeffrey Epstein's Mark Zuckerberg's Meta, and Jeffrey Epstein's Conrad Black's media empire, and Jeffrey Epstein's Sergey Brin's and Larry Page's Google, and/or other Jeffrey Epstein orbiters to push their ongoing lies used to overthrow the United States.

Per the testimony of child victims that were sex trafficked, and per psychoanalysis by mental health professionals like Yale's Brandy Yee, this crime syndicate's members also manifest dark triad personality characteristics, for example, but not limited to psychopathy (impulse control problem, where the individual can't stop themselves from violating the law, rules, and/or norms in order to self-serve (hoard more assets by any means, which pretty much defines Jeffrey Epstein's failed billionaire experiment), no matter who they harm, exploit, and/or kill); narcissism (impulse control problem where the individual can't stop themselves from self-promoting in order to hoard more assets, like Jeffrey Epstein's Trump and EU royals do daily, and where the EU 'royals', Trump family, and RFK Jr's Kennedy family were the largest named families in Jeffrey Epstein's client books, which we have published in the Epstein's Black Book link above); and Machiavellianism (impulse control problem where the individual can't stop themselves from deceiving/manipulating others in order to hoard more assets).

"The dark triad is a psychological theory of personality, first published by Delroy L. Paulhus and Kevin M. Williams in 2002,^[1] that describes three notably offensive, but non-pathological personality types: Machiavellianism, sub-clinical narcissism, and sub-clinical psychopathy.^[2][3][4][5] Each of these personality types is called dark because each is considered to contain malevolent qualities.^[2][6][7][8]

All three dark triad traits are conceptually distinct although empirical evidence shows them to be overlapping. They are associated with a callous–manipulative interpersonal style.^[9]

• Narcissism is characterized by grandiosity, pride, egotism, and a lack of empathy.^[10]
• Machiavellianism is characterized by manipulativeness, indifference to morality, lack of empathy, and a calculated focus on self-interest.^[11][12]
• Psychopathy is characterized by continuous antisocial behavior, impulsivity, selfishness, callous and unemotional traits (CU),^[13] and remorselessness.^[14]

High scores in these traits have been found to statistically increase a person's likelihood to commit crimes, cause social distress, and create severe problems for organizations, especially if they are in leadership positions.^[15] They also tend to be less compassionate, agreeable, empathetic, and satisfied with their lives, and less likely to believe they and others are good.^[16] However, the same traits are also associated with some positive outcomes, such as mental toughness and being more likely to embrace challenges.^[17]

A factor analysis found that among the big five personality traits, low agreeableness is the strongest correlate of the dark triad, while neuroticism and a lack of conscientiousness were associated with some of the dark triad members.^[12] Research indicates that there is a consistent association between changes in agreeableness and the dark triad traits over the course of an individual's life.^[18]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triad

And we would add one more disorder or disease to define the disease or mental health disorder known as billionaireism, and that's kleptomania, an impulse control problem, where the advanced billionaire hoarder's disease is so advanced, that they feel they need to steal assets in order to hoard them, which includes stealing elections to be able to divert/steal taxpayer funds into the coffers of Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate.

And so billionaireism is seemingly a complex mental health disorder involving hoarding, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, narcissism, and kleptomania.

And what is the perceived end goal of billionaireism? To be able to act like giant babies who constantly needs others to do things for them, feed them, clean up after them, drive them around to their activities, and when they don't get what they want, expect a giant crying hissy fit and a lot of drama, until they get what they want right now.

Legal authorities will step in and stop a hoarder from hoarding more assets than they need or can use, if that conduct harms them or others. And yet no one is stopping these hoarders, and as a result, they continue to harm themselves and others. Seemingly most people would argue that Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate and Trump's have harmed themselves and others.

But don't take our word for it, read what Katie Johnson had to say about her and Maria Doe being gang raped (a type of hoarding of someone else's body against their consent) by Donald Trump and/or Jeffrey Epstein.

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Calif_Lawsuit.pdf