HOW GENETIC RESEARCH PROVES 6,000+ "ETHNIC GROUPS" AND EMBARRASSES THE CHILDISH USE OF 3-10 "RACES"
As a former molecular biologist and geneticist working in microbial and cancer molecular biology working for some of the largest and smallest "Big Pharma" organizations, networks, and Fortune 500 companies in Northern CA, the Greater Silicon Valley, and San Francisco Area, and as a former certified medical research professional at Stanford University and University of California (Santa Cruz, UCSF, and UC Davis) and their Schools of Medicine -- I once had an office at Stanford University School of Medicine, nearly directly above the office of my absolute idol -- Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza -- who wrote one of the largest (almost the size of a small toaster oven) and most impressive bodies of research I had ever read at the time, specifically, The History and Geography of Human Genes (the PDF of the first 48 pages made available below, courtesy of https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225035554_The_History_and_Geography_of_Human_Gene), and where Cavalli' Sforza's student, Dr. Spencer Wells, would go on to lead the National Genographic Project, which I participated in, and where both of these titans conducted similar global genetics research, and collectively elucidated well over 6,000 different unique ethnic groups based on the unique genetics of their ethnic groups, and where in part understanding of the known history and branching of language and cultures surely helped resolve these 6000+ ethnic groups, which embarrasses the 3-10 "race" labels employed by most others, which have little value because of the tremendous admixing of human populations.
More simply, the movement of people around the Earth, compounded by modern travel, has mixed the gene pools of enough people to create more than 6,000 different groups of people, all with a common origin, Africa, and where any arbitrary line in the sands of history is just that, arbitrary.
JUST BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE BLACK SKIN DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE SHOULD IGNORE 96% OF OUR AFRICAN HERITAGE
Accordingly, though I may identify as American, Canadian, French, German, English, Dutch, and Scottish, and though I may appear "white", the truth is that my family members, like all human families, have Africa heritage, and like many Europeans, I also have Middle Eastern and Indian genes (from which came Hitler's Aryan race out of India, and where most people do not know that the Aryan race that Hitler advocated for originated among some of the darkest-skinned people in India).
The same has been proven by the oldest DNA that has been found to date, in Eastern Africa, which all humans share, and then by comparing the differences in DNA blocks, known as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), scientists like Cavalii-Sforza and Wells, were able to develop maps as to when and where individuals from these oldest African humans branched off from the same, and in what direction around the globe.
But again, I look white or Caucasian. So should I ignore some of my family tree, some of my heritage, because of the amount of skin protein my skin produces, or in my case, doesn't produce as much of, relative to my early ancestors? Should you?
If we were to do the same, what percentage of our family history would be need to ignore?
Recent genetics research presented in the last two years helps answer this question, as follows.
More specifically, as specified in the research presented at https://www.science.org/content/article/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin, white skin, or skin without or with little pigment, didn't occur in Europe until about 8,000 years ago, when an inheritable genetic mutation in the protein that protects from Sun damage, became mutated, likely due to increasing proximity of the Earth to the Sun, due to the contraction of the eccentricity of the Earth's orbit towards the Earth, signalling the end of the Ice Age, increasing solar intensity, and resulting in some of the first large populations of white humans.
ALBINO HUMANS, WHITE SKIN, BLUE EYES, AND BLONDE HAIR HAVE ONLY EXISTED FOR 4%-5% OF ALL HUMAN HISTORY
Given humans (admixed primates) don't show up on the tree of life until a widely accepted 200,000 year period, and dividing the same into 8,000 years, and multiplying by 100%, results in the number we are looking for here, and that number is 4%.
To summarize, for 4% of all of humanity's known history, white humans have existed. Said the other way, for 96% of all known human history, humans have been much darker than white human beings. Accordingly, my family, and I, and others, who identify as exclusively European, would have to ignore the earlier 96% of our family tree and heritage, so almost all of it, in some delusional attempt to identify with a part of the globe our families passed through and remained in for a relatively brief period in both human and geological history.
Similarly, recent research into eye color has revealed almost exactly the same time period for eye color.
More specifically, around about 10,000 years ago, dark-eyed humans began to develop genetic mutations, per the following research https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/a43656366/everyone-with-blue-eyes-may-come-from-same-human-ancestor/. The same type of calculation as employed above would result in only 5% of our family history, and would require us to ignore 95% of our family history and family heritage, so again, almost all of our family history and heritage, in order to claim that we were only of European descent.
This arbitrary European heritage line isn't unique to Europeans, among the last on the scene across human history, per the following genetic-based human migration map, and yet Europeans were not the last on the scene, and so they can't claim to be the most evolved or anything like that either.
A quick analysis of this map reveals that all human heritage begins in Eastern Africa, then branches out in every direction.
Having engaged in glaciation and desert research both directly (as a Royal Society researcher at the Artic Research Institute of North America and for the Mars Society at MDRS in Utah), and as a researcher of the glaciation and desert research of others, my research into the migrations of early Africans around Africa and onto other bodies of land thereafter reveal that climate change linked to changes in glaciation-linked warming and cooling periods caused these Africa migrations, compounded by warm and cold ocean currents, mostly on the East and West sides of continents, respectively, which would have impacted the food chain dynamics, which would have caused migration during the hunter and gathering periods of early human history. Other variables my research considered was the distribution of rain at the equator and tropics during these warming and cooling periods, as well as maps of ancient forests and deserts.
The 70,000 years ago migration out of Africa is a good candidate for ancestors of all people who are not purely of Africa descent, and where these Africans both share the migration path with the Denisovans and suspected admixed Aryan Caucasians from India and the Caucasas Mountains, who make a pit stop in the Fertile Crescent, eventually resulting in the Germanic and Slavic branches in Europe from Northern Greece.
ALBINO AND ALBINISM GENETICS RESEARCH DEBUNK "WHITE REPLACEMENT THEORY" AS A "BIG LIE"
The following contributors have collected reported that "Albinism affects people of all ethnic backgrounds; its frequency worldwide is estimated to be approximately one in 17,000. Prevalence of the different forms of albinism varies considerably by population, and is highest overall in people of sub-Saharan African descent.[29] Today, the prevalence of albinism in sub-Saharan Africa is around 1 in 5,000, while in Europe and the US it is around 1 in 20,000 of the European derived population.[30][21] Rates as high as 1 in 1,000 have been reported for some populations in Zimbabwe and other parts of Southern Africa.[22]
Certain ethnic groups and populations in isolated areas exhibit heightened susceptibility to albinism, presumably due to genetic factors. These include notably the Native American Kuna, Zuni and Hopi nations (respectively of Panama, New Mexico and Arizona); Japan, in which one particular form of albinism is unusually common (OCA 4);[31] and Ukerewe Island, the population of which shows a very high incidence of albinism.[32]"
To put this in perspective, for every 1,000 to 20,000 African or any other couples, a white baby, with blonde hair, blue eyes, and/or white skin will be born to them. This means that it is genetically-impossible to replace and render extinct white humans. Even if we were all rounded up and shot, more would naturally be born.
Other genetic research proves that as many as 100 different genes result in white or albino animals across the animal kingdom [20], explaining why there are white monkeys, white apes, white dogs, white lobsters, white cats, white zebras, white tigers, white snakes, white rats, white birds, white horses, white ducks, white geese, white bugs, white fish, and other white animals.
More simply, across the animal kingdom, more than 100 different genes cause most animals, including humans, to be born white to darker animals, due to genetics, and this was and is caused by a genetic mutation.
Accordingly, it is a "big lie" that white humans are going to be "replaced", when the opposite is true, white humans are going to continue to have white children, and black, brown, and yellow couples are going to continue to give birth to white children.
All of this also debunks the "White Dilution Theory", because remember, for 96% of all human history, prior to the inheritable albino genes and/or mutations being passed on by and/or occurring across all of humanity, humans were mostly black, brown, or darker skinned, and so for 190,000 to 195,000 years, humans gave birth to darker children, so it isn't that some evil plot is trying to eradicate white people, it's that we are the new kids in town (who eradicated others to come to town), and so we can't shocked that there aren't more of us, nor is it anyone else's fault, but rather, that's just the way things worked out.
America's first people were Asians, but Asians like European were Africans.
So we don't need to be angry at those who don't look like us, but instead we need to embrace them, because we share the same ancestors as they do, literally, as proven by the genetics of the oldest woman and oldest man ever found, they are literally our family members, which may be why some people who need to use "big lies" every 50 years or so keep using these "big lies" to divide and conquer most of us.
AN INTRODUCTION TO ACTIVE MEASURES
Accordingly, why are citizens around the world, in particular in European and American countries, being bombarded with false information that were are being replaced and diluted? Our research found that the answer may be found in the nature and resurrection of Egyptian, Greek, Roman, German, French, English, European, and American imperial cults and their active measures tactics, also known as psyops or divide-and-conquer tactics, where a very small percent of the world's population, on the order of 1/1000th convinces now over 8,000,000,000 people, to hate natural differences in the population, polarizing every demographic variable they can, to pit us against one another, to divide and conquer us all, which we address in our Ongoing Investigation. We balance this perspective with the fact that overpopulation, exponentially increasing product demand, and the resulting pollution is killing life on Earth so fast, that humanity is responsible for the 6th mass extinction event on Earth.
ADDITIONAL ATTRIBUTES
[20] Binkley, S. K. "Color on, color off" (PDF). Retrieved January 22, 2015.
[21] Greaves, M. (2014). "Was skin cancer a selective force for black pigmentation in early hominin evolution?". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 281 (1781): 20132955. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2955. PMC 3953838. PMID 24573849.
[22] Hong, E. S.; Zeeb, H.; Repacholi, M. H. (2006). "Albinism in Africa as a public health issue". BMC Public Health. 6: 212. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-212. PMC 1584235. PMID 16916463.
[29] Gronskov, K.; Ek, J.; Brondum-Nielsen, K. (2 November 2007). "Oculocutaneous albinism". Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2: 43. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-2-43. PMC 2211462. PMID 17980020.
[31] "Entry - #606574 - ALBINISM, OCULOCUTANEOUS, TYPE IV; OCA4 - OMIM". omim.org. Retrieved 5 March 2023.
[32] "Ukerewe Albino Society". Southern Africas Children. 2009. Archived from the original on 24 December 2012. Retrieved 21 July 2010.