Do albino Indians, Asians, Africans, monkeys, and apes look like European Americans, and if so, why?

Blonde hair, blues eyes, white skin, and freckles is what this man above has, and where if I didn't tell you where he was from, and if I asked you to guess, very reasonable guesses would be that this beautiful man -- who could easily be a highly paid model for the likes of Vogue or GQ -- has family that originates in Northwest Europe, maybe Germany, Sweden, Norway, or Finland?[1]

The following photos are members of his family -- and asking you the same question regarding their "race" or their "ethnicity" would likely yield the same sort of guesses -- somewhere in Northwestern Europe?[1]

And if I asked you to guess the names of these beautiful people, reasonable guesses would be Friedrich, Klaus, or Hans, or for the beautiful young woman below, also part of their family, Ingrid, or maybe Hanna?[1]  

But what if I told you that none of those guesses were even remotely correct, and that this beautiful family is from Delhi, India? And the beautiful names for these beautiful people, from top to bottom, are Vijay, Ramkishan, and Pooja. Would you believe me? Because that is where these beautiful people are from, and these are their beautiful names -- and where I'm not saying they are beautiful because they have blonde hair and blue eyes and fair skin, but because they are beautiful people by all standards.[1]

What if I asked you to guess where the following female is from and to randomly guess her name? Iceland? Finland? Russia? Nadia? Mika? Katiana?[2]

Wrong again. Her name is Xueli, and she's originally from China. [2][3] How about the next photo?[4]

This lad is from Africa.[6]

The thing they all have in common is OCA1-type albinism, which means that they synthesize melanin from tyrosine 3-monooxygenase (tyrosinase) amino acid, which forms the skin protein known as melanin, which protects humans from skin cancer when they are exposed to high energy particles from the Sun -- and where those who have more melanin, are more protected from Sun-based cancers than those who have less -- when exposed to the same amount of Sun, and discounting all other variables like tumor suppressor genes, DNA repair genes, and immune system and environmental factors and differences.[5]

IMPERIAL CULT WHITE HATE IS AN ARTIFACT OF ANIMAL HIERARCHY DOMINANCE FROM JUNGLE TIMES

Accordingly, from a certain perspective, "white hate" is rooted in jealousy regarding a better ability to adapt to skin cancer, as much as "white hate" is rooted in fear and false propaganda serving the divide and conquer active measures strategies of polarizing natural differences found in populations, by imperial cults and their ongoing organized crime syndicates vomiting the same.

In our series, African Mutterland, UpRights News debunks the "white lies" of imperial cults and their organized crime syndicate constantly trying incite us to in-fight and hate one another, instead of hating the criminal ruling class and failed billionaire experiment who orchestrate all of the same, all of the same, and generation after generation.

It turns out "big white lies" are just a distract for ongoing organized crimes. As long we hate any difference between one another, and as long as that is all we hear in the media, then that's what we'll focus on, instead of the $3-4 trillion taxpayer heist perpetuated annually.

That's a lot of incentive to tell a lot of "big white lies", intentionally release bioweapons, to intentionally infect (and thus kill) others, while having family members direct taxpayer funds into their organized crime syndicate.

Part of that toxic narrative trains our brains to "believe" in a hierarchy or kingdom (or king's dome) for every living thing in life, the "kingdom" of heaven, the kingdom of life, the animal kingdom, the United kingdoms, and where a hierarchy, per organizational learning and development theory for executives, teaches that a kingdom is only one of many different types of ways humans and other animals can organize.

As long as we "believe" or have "faith" that everything is a hierarchy, then we'll viciously compete against one another for a spot on the ladder, and be followers and rarely leaders, who save leadership for their own, with some exceptions.

Note that every branch of the U.S. government is also organized as a hierarchy, where the President is the "king" of the executive, and the Supreme Court justice is the "king" of the Supreme Court, and where the Speaker and Vice President are the "kings" and/or "queens" of Congress. In hierarchy structures, most of the ideas are decided from the top of the hierarchy.

Note that every organization is also organized as a hierarchy, where the wealthiest shareholder who owns the most shares of the organization, or who gets paid the most, is the "king" of the organization, and everyone else the "king's" servants or slaves. And where to make sure that every slave does what they are told, even if the same is criminal, at least within the United States, the health insurance and income for everyone and their families are tied to serving the kings and queens of organizations, or else, count on being denied access to the resources required to survive and grow. Do what the slave owner says, or else die, and or else your family dies. 

As an added layer of protection, most retirement plans are tied to the same, and so try and stop one of these publicly-traded companies from engaging in crimes or harm, and now you are threatening the entire future of the country. That's a neat trick. Another neat trick is having the country pour their paychecks into these companies for their "retirement", but where there are two "classes" of stocks, those allowed to make decisions by voting, and those who are not allowed to vote, and of course where the failed billionaire experiment owns the majority shares of most of the largest companies, and so they own the lifeline of the future of the country. That's a neat trick also. Then by consolidating corporate power, which is really billionaire power, via mergers and acquisitions, these companies own the food, rights to DNA for food seeds, water, energy, transportation, and communications.

In their defense, to balance, the same decentralizes power from any one organization or government, to prevent the likes of monarchies and dictatorships, but what the failed billionaire experiment and ongoing organized crime syndicate of Jeffrey Epstein has revealed, is that the failed billionaire experiment networks billionaires, who then more or less facilitate a dictatorship via an oligarchy in an organized manner that doesn't operate much differently than a dictatorship, so damned if we keep them, and damned if we don't. 

However, organizational development theory teaches that hierarchies are for times when there is little to no chaos, and flat structures or democracies are better during chaotic times. A failure to decentralize power during chaotic times results in an inflexibility that causes organizations to collapse, and executives with MBAs know this, because they have been taught this. 

Accordingly, the chaos being engineered by the organized crime syndicate of Jeffrey Epstein, Trump, the GOP, and Russia, while seeking to centralize power under totalitarian regimes is in fact a strategy to engineer the collapse of Western democracies.

This is being aided by crushing inflation, unlivable wages, interest rate hikes, the theft and/or destruction of social safety nets, tax evasion/avoidance by the wealthiest individuals and their companies, while inciting almost every segment of the population most affected, the poverty and middle classes, to hate and attack one another, inciting violence, while expanding gun rights, while inciting civil war, while engineering poverty, while engineering the worship of the organized crime leaders orchestrating the same, while putting them above the law, while clawing back rights for nearly everyone else. What could go wrong with this situation, right?

The same is in effect, an additional spoke in the ongoing conspiracy to overthrow the United States and Western democracies by organized crime being investigated for some of the same.  

The opposite of a hierarchy organizational structure or vertical structure, is a flat or horizontal structure, also known as a democracy, where most of the decision-making is made by majority rule, where every person gets an equal vote as to how the organization should be governed. 

The failed billionaire experiment operates as a networked hierarchy or oligarchy, where each billionaire is who tells their companies and roughly 100 largest financial institutions what they want for 8 billion people. The failed billionaire experiment exists in every country, and so they have at least 200 countries they can collapse, expand, sent to slaughter, sent to war, infect, and the like. There is no doubt the failed billionaire experiment is the most immediate threat to all humanity, and yet they may be the most effective solution to overpopulation, but they aren't the only nor the best solution to overpopulation.

Then the failed billionaire experiment bribes every level of government, from the top to the bottom, from the right to the left, directly, indirectly through their companies, indirectly through organizing campaign contributions, indirectly through different types of organizations, including their financial institutions, and where they have been eroding the rights of citizens across the world to formalize their networked hierarchy, best summarized by the very public activities of the Republican Party in the United States, who have been known to specify their intent to destroy democracy, the law, law enforcement, and/or the rights and voice of the people in their participation of their own governance.

The same is not that different from dominance hierarchy found in the jungle, which is where humans came from, before they came from Eastern Africa, specifically from the jungles of Western Africa. The primary difference is that in the jungle, it is the strongest who survive and grow, whereas in human animals, it is the richest who survive and grow, the difference between Darwinian or natural selection among species and Social Darwinism selection among species, respectively.

In the jungle, the most deceptive and most vicious animals are the ones who scare all the other animals into submission and into allowing these scary animals to take more than their fair share of the otherwise shared resources required to survive and to grow.

Humans are animals and so are the oligarchs in the failed billionaire experiment, who scare all of the other human animals into allowing them to take more than their fair share of the otherwise shared resources required to survive and grow, by spreading their "big white lies" and "white hate" and other divisive propaganda, meant to divide us non-billionaires, who if united, could free ourselves from this generational oppression in a single day, any day of the week, which is why the failed billionaire experiment needs to deceive us into hating one another, instead of hating our oppressors.

This is an old game, as old as the oldest animals.

It turns out the "New World Order" is simply a resurrection and rebranding of the old world order, "Guerrilla" warfare.

Below is an image of an albino or "white" guerrilla.[6]

Below that are three images of Uakari monkies, who almost look and/or act identical to humans, and/or to at least one former president, with devilish red hair, and poorly-groomed blonde hair with a receding hair line. The last two images are of a chimpanzee and an ape with alopecia, a disorder that causes some primates to lose some to all of their body hair.[7][8][9][10][11][12]

Could humans be albino apes with alopecia?

It turns out that genetics proves we have 99.6% DNA in common with chimpanzees.[13] 

Maybe the reason the failed billionaire experiment behaves like savages is that they're related to them?