How does comparative primatology explain the crime syndicate of child trafficker Vladimir Putin's Russia and Jeffrey Epstein's Prince Andrew, Leon Black, and Donald Trump? How are they the same and how are they different than savages in the jungle?

Big, Dumb, White Apes: The Snowflake Cancer

Comparative primatology is the study of how primates, a type of animal, compare to one another from a behavioral, physical, genetic, and molecular perspective.

Above is a photograph of Snowflake, the albino gorilla -- who died of cancer linked to Snowflake's white skin, unable to produce enough melanin skin pigment protein protection to protect Snowflake from invisible types of light that stream off the closest star (the Sun, which is a puddle of hydrogen gas in out space that was so large that it generated so much gravitational pressure that it literally self-combusted, and that hydrogen puddle lit on fire, and was so hot that it fused the hydrogen molecules into most of the other types of atoms on Earth, then the Sun later exploded, resulting in the solar system's planets, moons, and debris, as what exploded cooled and became trapped in orbits around the Sun).[1]

Snowflake's DNA revealed that Snowflake was a product of inbreeding, much like the Privilegium maius-forged and illegitimate UK and EU royal families of Jeffrey Epstein, which can result in all sorts of strange physical, medical, and mental disorders, inside and outside of the body.[15][14]

Inbreeding occurs when family members have sex with one another and give birth to inbred children as a result.

In the case of the forged and illegitimate royal families of the UK and EU, and possibly explaining their "ravishing" look(s), there are serious medical conditions their family members have had to deal with as a result of having sex and then children with one another, from the Habsburg jaw facial deformation cause by incest or inbreeding, to their blood clotting hemophilia genetic disorder, and/or to the professed mental illness of "prince" Harry and/or Jeffrey Epstein's "prince" Andrew, but not limited to the same.

Fortunately for the health of their families, but at a further detriment to their legitimacy as legitimate royals, DNA testing has proven that several royal bastards were born, specifically Richard III and/or Edward IV, which means that at least some new blood was added to their already troubled blood line, which often struggled to bear viable children, another sign of excessive incest or inbreeding, causing all sorts of development and health problems inside and outside of the body.[14][3]

THE  INBRED FORGED ROYAL HABSBURG CRIME FAMILY JAW

The following are some flattering portraits of different Habsburg royals, whose family members couldn't or didn't stop sleeping with one another, resulting in an incest or inbreeding disorder known as mandibular prognathism, which presents as wretched disfiguring of the lower jaw.[3][6]

It is important to note that the forged royal Habsburg crime family, who forged their royal claims via documents known as Privilegium maius,  commissioned paintings like this one below of Charles II of Spain, which surely were meant to paint these monsters in a manner that made them more beautiful than they were, and yet hideous nonetheless.[3][14]

Here's what this genetic manifestation actually looks like, based on clinical photographs, which presents a more accurate picture of what the incestuous or inbreeding forged royal Habsburgs may have actually looked like, and so the portraits the Habsburg's commissioned are tame and flattering compared to the image below.[3]

But that's what deceptively cheating and stealing other people's titles, thrones, lands, and property allows fake royals to do -- to have someone paint a more flattering portrait of them, for them to be remembered in better and false light, almost their family moto.[14]

Here are some more flattering portraits of "Habsburg jaws" resulting from "royal" incest and inbreeding.[7]

Below is a side profile of Harry when he was much younger -- without the I-just-crawled-out-of-a-rescue-boat look he seems to be often sporting, usually with sparkles in tow by his side, almost like a sequenced shield he can pull into a photo at any moment, or like a small child that always needs to hold mommy's hand? But can you blame him? There are allegations his father and his grandmother had his mother executed to keep their family in a game of thrones they should have never sat on.[14]

Given the Habsburg imbreeding, new blood in the UK/EU blood line is definitely a blessing for all those subjected to their near daily pity propaganda.

When you are near the bottom of the ladder, the good thing is that you can always climb up, as they have -- one treason, suitcase full of cash, sex trafficked child, charity scam, donation involving the family of Osama Bin Laden, and/or "fucking grift" at a time (per Spotify executive Bill Simmons).[14]

Obviously "defenders of the faith" kind of stuff, right up there with accused insurrectionist, seditionist, traitor, elections fraudster, and/or child rapist -- Donald Trump -- "Making America Great Again" as the "Second Coming of Jesus Christ".[14]

And what's shocking is that there are actually "suckers and losers" (how Trump referred to dead WWII soldiers who fought for the allies, the US and UK Commonwealth) who fall for this crap, put their lives and the lives of their families on the line for this crap, and who go to jail in support of their "big lies". But that's what a cult of personality looks like. Deceivers who get others to follow and believe their deception, to the extent they are ready to die for deception in a world gone horribly wrong.[14]

Note below Harry's lower jaw seems to come forward in a Habsburg jaw manner, and yet the bottom teeth are set back, which may be natural or may have required "engineering". It's hard to tell what so much incest or inbreeding will do generations later. 

In Harry's defense, there are also rumors that his father is not actually his father, but we don't pretend to know all of Harry's family history, nor his medical history he hasn't shared, nor are we experts in royal inbreeding, nor medical experts in their resulting tragic disfigurement, affecting their teeth, hair loss, chimp-like ears, blood clotting, mental illness, and/or any other known problem these forged royals and/or others have or contributed to, or not -- and frankly, we just don't care enough about fake royals to invest too much research into anything more than on their ongoing organized crimes and/or that of their proxies and immediate orbits.[14]

It's not our job to help the fake royals "save face", but with so much inbreeding, there's simply some faces that can't be saved, no matter how much defrauded taxpayers funds and/or other funds got by fake tales, fucking grifting, and/or illegitimate laws went into securing the same regularly.[14]

JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S UK/EU ROYALS, SNOWFLAKE (APE), AND BONOBOS (CHIMP) SHARE INBREEDING

Jeffrey Epstein's forged UK and EU royals and Snowflake the ape aren't the only ones whose family members or predecessors engaged in out of control incest or inbreeding.

It turns out this is common behavior among bonobos or Pan paniscus primates, among humanity's closest primate cousins along with chimpanzees.[11]

More simply, some humans like Jeffrey Epstein's forged UK and EU royals, apes, and bonobos share primate incest or inbreeding as a behavioral or cultural trait, per comparative primatological research findings.[2]

BONOBOS ARE PUBLIC MASTURBATORS OF THEMSELVES, OTHERS, AND CHILDREN 

In our quest to find answers as to why "prince" Andrew's and/or Jeffrey Epstein's organized crime syndicate's child kidnapping, child sex trafficking, and/or child rape syndicate behave as they do, we found an enormous amount of answers in comparative primatological research, with special emphasis on Pan paniscus, which could appropriately be renamed as Pan penis-cause based on what is considered "normal" behavior or "normal culture by these literal primitive savages of the jungle.[14]

More specifically, "Sexual activity generally plays a major role in bonobo society, being used as what some scientists perceive as a greeting, a means of forming social bonds, a means of conflict resolution, and postconflict reconciliation.[85][4] Bonobos are the only non-human animal to have been observed engaging in tongue kissing.[86] Bonobos and humans are the only primates to typically engage in face-to-face genital sex, although a pair of western gorillas has also been photographed in this position.[87]

Bonobos do not form permanent monogamous sexual relationships with individual partners. They also do not seem to discriminate in their sexual behavior by sex or age, with the possible exception of abstaining from sexual activity between mothers and their adult sons. When bonobos come upon a new food source or feeding ground, the increased excitement will usually lead to communal sexual activity, presumably decreasing tension and encouraging peaceful feeding.[88]

More often than the males, female bonobos engage in mutual genital-rubbing behavior, possibly to bond socially with each other, thus forming a female nucleus of bonobo society. The bonding among females enables them to dominate most of the males.[88] Adolescent females often leave their native community to join another community. This migration mixes the bonobo gene pools, providing genetic diversity. Sexual bonding with other females establishes these new females as members of the group.

Bonobo clitorises are larger and more externalized than in most mammals;[89] while the weight of a young adolescent female bonobo "is maybe half" that of a human teenager, she has a clitoris that is "three times bigger than the human equivalent, and visible enough to waggle unmistakably as she walks".[90] In scientific literature, the female–female behavior of bonobos pressing genitals together is often referred to as genito-genital (GG) rubbing,[88][91].

This sexual activity happens within the immediate female bonobo community and sometimes outside of it. Ethologist Jonathan Balcombe stated that female bonobos rub their clitorises together rapidly for ten to twenty seconds, and this behavior, "which may be repeated in rapid succession, is usually accompanied by grinding, shrieking, and clitoral engorgement"; he added that it is estimated that they engage in this practice "about once every two hours" on average.[89] As bonobos occasionally copulate face-to-face, "evolutionary biologist Marlene Zuk has suggested that the position of the clitoris in bonobos and some other primates has evolved to maximize stimulation during sexual intercourse".[89] The position of the clitoris may alternatively permit GG-rubbings, which has been hypothesized to function as a means for female bonobos to evaluate their intrasocial relationships.[92]

Bonobo males engage in various forms of male–male genital behavior.[88][93] The most common form of male–male mounting is similar to that of a heterosexual mounting: one of the males sits "passively on his back [with] the other male thrusting on him", with the penises rubbing together due to both males' erections.[41] In another, rarer form of genital rubbing, two bonobo males hang from a tree limb face-to-face while penis fencing.[88][94]

This also may occur when two males rub their penises together while in face-to-face position. Another form of genital interaction (rump rubbing) often occurs to express reconciliation between two males after a conflict, when they stand back-to-back and rub their scrotal sacs together, but such behavior also occurs outside agonistic contexts: Kitamura (1989) observed rump–rump contacts between adult males following sexual solicitation behaviors similar to those between female bonobos prior to GG-rubbing.[95] Takayoshi Kano observed similar practices among bonobos in the natural habitat. Tongue kissing, oral sex, and genital massaging have also been recorded among male bonobos.[96][41]

Wild females give birth for the first time at 13 or 14 years of age.[97] Bonobo reproductive rates are no higher than those of the common chimpanzee.[88] However, female bonobo oestrus periods are longer.[98] During oestrus, females undergo a swelling of the perineal tissue lasting 10 to 20 days. The gestation period is on average 240 days. Postpartum amenorrhea (absence of menstruation) lasts less than one year and a female may resume external signs of oestrus within a year of giving birth, though the female is probably not fertile at this point. Female bonobos carry and nurse their young for four years and give birth on average every 4.6 years.[99] Compared to common chimpanzees, bonobo females resume the genital swelling cycle much sooner after giving birth, enabling them to rejoin the sexual activities of their society. Also, bonobo females which are sterile or too young to reproduce still engage in sexual activity. Mothers will help their sons get more matings from females in oestrus.[59]

Adult male bonobos have sex with infants,[100] although without penetration.[101] Adult females also have sex with infants, but less frequently. Infants are not passive participants. They quite often initiate contacts with both adult males and females, as well as with peers.[100] They have also been shown to be sexually active even in the absence of any stimulation or learning from adults.[102]

Infanticide, while well documented in chimpanzees, is apparently absent in bonobo society.[103] Although infanticide has not been directly observed, there have been documented cases of both female[104] and male[105] bonobos kidnapping infants, sometimes resulting in infants dying from dehydration. Although male bonobos have not yet been seen to practice infanticide, there is a documented incident in captivity involving a dominant female abducting an infant from a lower-ranking female, treating the infant roughly and denying it the chance to suckle.

During the kidnapping, the infant's mother was clearly distressed and tried to retrieve her infant. Had the zookeepers not intervened, the infant almost certainly would have died from dehydration. This suggests female bonobos can have hostile rivalries with each other and a propensity to carry out infanticide.[106] The highly sexual nature of bonobo society and the fact that there is little competition over mates means that many males and females are mating with each other, in contrast to the one dominant male chimpanzee that fathers most of the offspring in a group.[107]

The strategy of bonobo females mating with many males may be a counterstrategy to infanticide because it confuses paternity. If male bonobos cannot distinguish their own offspring from others, the incentive for infanticide essentially disappears.[103] This is a reproductive strategy that seems specific to bonobos; infanticide is observed in all other great apes except orangutans.[108]"[10]

Accordingly, bonobo chimp behavior is almost identical to the behavior of "prince" Andrew's, Donald Trump's, and/or Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate of child kidnappers, child sex traffickers, and/or child rapists.[10][14] 

A really interesting aspect of studying the human brain is how the same is organized. The brain stem or bottom part of the back of the brain that connects the head to the spine, is known as the ancient or primitive brain, around which the emotional brain or lymbic fight or flight system is wrapped, and then way later both in the structure of the brain, and in the evolution of the brain, is the prefrontal cortex or front of the brain, where things like thinking, analysis, calculation, and the like are found.[17][18]

Accordingly, where bonobos, child sex trafficker Vladimir Putin, and Jeffrey Epstein's "prince" Andrew, Donald Trump, Fox News' Rupert Murdoch, and/or Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate of child kidnappers, child sex traffickers, and/or child rapists intersect is in the more primitive brain and lymbic system sections, likely in the part of the brain responsible for thirst and food craving, sex craving, drug abuse craving, and general mood control -- the hypothalamus -- where the craving to rape children becomes so great, that it overcomes their amygdala (responsible for risk and fear calculations, almond shape brain lobes behind each ear), and hijacks their thinking brain, causing them to lose all control of themselves, where they then kidnap, sex traffic, and rape children and others, or "grab 'em by the pussy" (Trump), rape or attack them behind curtains in or near public (Trump), rape them in changing rooms in department stores (Trump), rape them if they are 13 years old and/or threaten them not to come forward (Trump), rape them if they have been kidnapped or sex trafficked as children ("prince" Andrew and/or Jeffrey Epstein), and/or passing sex trafficked children "around", but not limited to the same.[10[14]

All perfectly explained by studying savages in the jungle, known as bonobos, and who are our second closest related primates after chimpanzees, who we share 99.6% DNA in common with, and it is the 0.4% of DNA we have different, which allows are brains to exceed the ability of adult chimps, who mature at an age comparable to a human 4 year old child, who have regular tantrums, become emotionally-unhinged, engage in violence, threaten violence, when they don't get what they need right now. [11]

Though we have studied psychology and been certified as Principle Investigators in behavioral research, none of us here at UpRights News are psychologists, but this sure does sound exactly like Donald Trump, and now we know why. He's related to and behaves identical to savages in the jungle. 

"Observations in the wild indicate that the males among the related common chimpanzee communities are hostile to males from outside the community. Parties of males 'patrol' for the neighboring males that might be traveling alone, and attack those single males, often killing them.[110] This does not appear to be the behavior of bonobo males or females, which seem to prefer sexual contact over violent confrontation with outsiders.[4]

While bonobos are more peaceful than chimpanzees, it is not true that they are unaggressive.[111] In the wild, among males, bonobos are half as aggressive as chimpanzees, while female bonobos are more aggressive than female chimpanzees.[111] Both bonobos and chimpanzees exhibit physical aggression more than 100 times as often as humans do.[111]

Although referred to as peaceful, bonobo aggression is not restricted to each other, and humans have also been attacked by bonobos, and suffered serious, albeit non-fatal, injuries.[105]

Bonobos are far less violent than chimpanzees, though, as lethal aggression is essentially nonexistent among bonobos while being not infrequent among chimpanzees.[45] It has been hypothesized that bonobos are able to live a more peaceful lifestyle in part because of an abundance of nutritious vegetation in their natural habitat, allowing them to travel and forage in large parties.[112]

Recent studies show that there are significant brain differences between bonobos and chimpanzees. Bonobos have more grey matter volume in the right anterior insula, right dorsal amygdala, hypothalamus, and right dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, all of which are regions assumed to be vital for feeling empathy, sensing distress in others and feeling anxiety.[113] They also have a thick connection between the amygdala, an important area that can spark aggression, and the ventral anterior cingulate cortex, which has been shown to help control impulses in humans.[114][115] This thicker connection may make them better at regulating their emotional impulses and behavior.[116]"[10]

Again, bonobo and chimpanzee comparative research seems to be a near perfect explanation and/or description of Donald Trump and his followers, but also "prince" Andrew, who has been reported to  "scream" when the teddy bears on his bed (one of which he named "daddy"), and/or a puppet he made to look like himself (which he used to grope victims of child and/or sex trafficking), are not put back exactly where they are supposed to be returned to daily, per "royal" staffers paid for by UK Commonwealth taxpayers.[11][14]

Accordingly, the child kidnapping, child sex trafficking, and/or child rape of "prince" Andrew, Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Rupert Murdoch of Fox News, Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, other members of the Trump family, other members of the royal family, their manufactured and/or deceived supporters, and/or others seems to be perfectly explained by researching other primates and primitive savages who live in the jungle.

For the sake of comparison, humans share 99.6% DNA in common with chimpanzees (Pan trygloytes), and about the same for bonobos (Pan paniscus), and we share about 1.6% DNA with chimps that we don't share with bonobos, and we share about the same 1.6% DNA with bonobos that we don't share with chimps.[11] 

Interestingly, within chimpanzee populations, there was more research or reporting on inbreeding than for bonobos, and where chimpanzees were found to be much more aggressive and violent than bonobos, who were much more sexualized.[2] 

This is super interesting because of animal and human behavior research concerning resource scarcity and incels or involuntary celibates (people who want a partner, mate, or who want to have sex but can't find a mate -- which by extension makes sex, mating, and/or affection a resource that can be made scarce after childhood) -- where the research showed that humans and animals who faced resource scarcity or who were unable to find a mate, affected their hypothalamus, amygdala, and/or emotional hijacking much more, and thus they were much more likely to become violent. 

From an evolutionary perspective and natural selection perspective that makes perfect sense, with respect to each creature wanting to not just live longer, but in a manner that perpetuates the species, and where any animal denied a resource, then has their hypothalamus, amygdala, lymbic system, and prefrontal cortex hijacked, to turn them into violent monsters, in order for them to fight for not just their survival to access resources like food and water, but also to access a mate for survival of the species. 

Accordingly, this near-totally answers why the child kidnapping, child sex trafficking, and/or child rape of "prince" Andrew, Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Rupert Murdoch of Fox News, Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, other members of the Trump family, other members of the royal family, their manufactured and/or deceived supporters, behave as they do.

Because they are extremely related to savages in the jungle who engage in exactly the same sort of behavior, suggesting that a spectrum of primate behaviors exists on which all primates, including humans, can be found -- placing the child kidnapping, child sex trafficking, and/or child rape of "prince" Andrew, Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Rupert Murdoch of Fox News, Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, other members of the Trump family, other members of the royal family, their manufactured and/or deceived supporters -- towards the lower end of the human primate spectrum with respect to self-control, closer to where savages like chimpazees and bonobos can be found -- and thus refuting the false "stable genius" claims made by Trump by extension -- a reasonable inference. 

In a similar manner, comparative primate research also explains why Jeffrey Epstein's Leon Black allegedly brutally-raped a retarded child with objects to the point of causing her to bleed, where she was later found by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell bleeding and crying, who denied her medical attention and instead decided to "play doctor" with her, in a manner similar to how some savages play with their food or prey.[14]

Here, "Primates have advanced cognitive abilities: some make tools and use them to acquire food and for social displays;[157][158] some can perform tasks requiring cooperation, influence and rank;[159] they are status conscious, manipulative and capable of deception;[160][161] they can recognise kin and conspecifics;[162][163] and they can learn to use symbols and understand aspects of human language including some relational syntax and concepts of number and numerical sequence.[164][165][166] ."[2]

Tool use by Leon Black on sex trafficked retarded children is not exclusive to primates, but is certainly prevalent across many different types of primates, "Tool use by non-humans is a phenomenon in which a non-human animal uses any kind of tool in order to achieve a goal such as acquiring food and water, grooming, defence, communication, recreation or construction. Originally thought to be a skill possessed only by humans, some tool use requires a sophisticated level of cognition. There is considerable discussion about the definition of what constitutes a tool and therefore which behaviours can be considered true examples of tool use. A wide range of animals, including mammals, birds, fish, cephalopods, and insects, are considered to use tools.

Primates are well known for using tools for hunting or gathering food and water, cover for rain, and self-defence. Chimpanzees have often been the object of study in regard to their usage of tools, most famously by Jane Goodall, since these animals are frequently kept in captivity and are closely related to humans. Wild tool use in other primates, especially among apes and monkeys, is considered relatively common, though its full extent remains poorly documented, as many primates in the wild are mainly only observed distantly or briefly when in their natural environments and living without human influence. Some novel tool-use by primates may arise in a localised or isolated manner within certain unique primate cultures, being transmitted and practised among socially connected primates through cultural learning. Many famous researchers, such as Charles Darwin in his 1871 book The Descent of Man, have mentioned tool use in monkeys (such as baboons).

Among other mammals, both wild and captive elephants are known to create tools using their trunks and feet, mainly for swatting flies, scratching, plugging up waterholes that they have dug (to close them up again so the water does not evaporate), and reaching food that is out of reach. In addition to primates and elephants, many other social mammals particularly have been observed engaging in tool use. A group of dolphins in Shark Bay uses sea sponges to protect their beaks while foraging. Sea otters will use rocks or other hard objects to dislodge food (such as abalone) and break open shellfish. Many or most mammals of the order Carnivora have been observed using tools, often to trap prey or break open the shells of prey, as well as for scratching and problem-solving."[19][14]

Research into Neanderthals and early hominid tool use provided an additional link between humans and other primates using tools, with the earliest stone tools dated at about 3.5 million years ago used by early human Australopithicus.[20]

"Numerous dates for the Neanderthal/human split have been suggested. The date of around 250,000 years ago cites "H. helmei" as being the last common ancestor (LCA), and the split is associated with the Levallois technique of making stone tools."[20]

"Despite the apparent 150 thousand year stagnation in Neanderthal lithic innovation,^[172] there is evidence that Neanderthal technology was more sophisticated than was previously thought.^[63] However, the high frequency of potentially debilitating injuries could have prevented very complex technologies from emerging, as a major injury would have impeded an expert's ability to effectively teach a novice.^[231]

Neanderthals made stone tools, and are associated with the Mousterian industry.^[27] The Mousterian is also associated with North African H. sapiens as early as 315,000 years ago^[323] and was found in Northern China about 47–37 thousand years ago in caves such as Jinsitai or Tongtiandong.^[324] It evolved around 300,000 years ago with the Levallois technique which developed directly from the preceding Acheulean industry (invented by H. erectus about 1.8 mya). Levallois made it easier to control flake shape and size, and as a difficult-to-learn and unintuitive process, the Levallois technique may have been directly taught generation to generation rather than via purely observational learning.^[28]

There are distinct regional variants of the Mousterian industry, such as: the Quina and La Ferrassie subtypes of the Charentian industry in southwestern France, Acheulean-tradition Mousterian subtypes A and B along the Atlantic and northwestern European coasts,^[325] the Micoquien industry of Central and Eastern Europe and the related Sibiryachikha variant in the Siberian Altai Mountains,^[259] the Denticulate Mousterian industry in Western Europe, the racloir industry around the Zagros Mountains, and the flake cleaver industry of Cantabria, Spain, and both sides of the Pyrenees. In the mid-20th century, French archaeologist François Bordes debated against American archaeologist Lewis Binford to explain this diversity (the "Bordes–Binford debate"), with Bordes arguing that these represent unique ethnic traditions and Binford that they were caused by varying environments (essentially, form vs. function).^[325] The latter sentiment would indicate a lower degree of inventiveness compared to modern humans, adapting the same tools to different environments rather than creating new technologies.^[52] A continuous sequence of occupation is well-documented in Grotte du Renne, France, where the lithic tradition can be divided into the Levallois–Charentian, Discoid–Denticulate (43.3±0.929–40.9±0.719 thousand years ago), Levallois Mousterian (40.2±1.5–38.4±1.3 thousand years ago), and Châtelperronian (40.93±0.393–33.67±0.450 thousand years ago).^[326]

There is some debate if Neanderthals had long-ranged weapons.^[327][328] A wound on the neck of an African wild ass from Umm el Tlel, Syria, was likely inflicted by a heavy Levallois-point javelin,^[329] and bone trauma consistent with habitual throwing has been reported in Neanderthals.^[327][328] Some spear tips from Abri du Maras, France, may have been too fragile to have been used as thrusting spears, possibly suggesting their use as darts.^[280]

The Châtelperronian in central France and northern Spain is a distinct industry from the Mousterian, and is controversially hypothesised to represent a culture of Neanderthals borrowing (or by process of acculturation) tool-making techniques from immigrating modern humans, crafting bone tools and ornaments. In this frame, the makers would have been a transitional culture between the Neanderthal Mousterian and the modern human Aurignacian.^{[330][331][332][333][334]} The opposing viewpoint is that the Châtelperronian was manufactured by modern humans instead.^[335] Abrupt transitions similar to the Mousterian/Châtelperronian could also simply represent natural innovation, like the La Quina–Neronian transition 50,000 years ago featuring technologies generally associated with modern humans such as bladelets and microliths. Other ambiguous transitional cultures include the Italian Uluzzian industry,^[336] and the Balkan Szeletian industry.^[337]

Before immigration, the only evidence of Neanderthal bone tools are animal rib lissoirs — which are rubbed against hide to make it more supple or waterproof — although this could also be evidence for modern humans immigrating earlier than expected. In 2013, two 51.4–41.1 thousand year old deer rib lissoirs were reported from Pech-de-l’Azé and the nearby Abri Peyrony in France.^{[332][99][99]} In 2020, five more lissoirs made of aurochs or bison ribs were reported from Abri Peyrony, with one dating to about 51,400 years ago and the other four to 47.7–41.1 thousand years ago. This indicates the technology was in use in this region for a long time. Since reindeer remains were the most abundant, the use of less abundant bovine ribs may indicate a specific preference for bovine ribs. Potential lissoirs have also been reported from Grosse Grotte, Germany (made of mammoth), and Grottes des Canalettes, France (red deer).^[338]

Smooth clam shell scrapers from Grotta dei Moscerini, Italy

The Neanderthals in 10 coastal sites in Italy (namely Grotta del Cavallo and Grotta dei Moscerini) and Kalamakia Cave, Greece, are known to have crafted scrapers using smooth clam shells, and possibly hafted them to a wooden handle. They probably chose this clam species because it has the most durable shell. At Grotta dei Moscerini, about 24% of the shells were gathered alive from the seafloor, meaning these Neanderthals had to wade or dive into shallow waters to collect them. At Grotta di Santa Lucia, Italy, in the Campanian volcanic arc, Neanderthals collected the porous volcanic pumice, which, for contemporary humans, was probably used for polishing points and needles. The pumices are associated with shell tools.^[276]

At Abri du Maras, France, twisted fibres and a 3-ply inner-bark-fibre cord fragment associated with Neanderthals show that they produced string and cordage, but it is unclear how widespread this technology was because the materials used to make them (such as animal hair, hide, sinew, or plant fibres) are biodegradable and preserve very poorly. This technology could indicate at least a basic knowledge of weaving and knotting, which would have made possible the production of nets, containers, packaging, baskets, carrying devices, ties, straps, harnesses, clothes, shoes, beds, bedding, mats, flooring, roofing, walls, and snares, and would have been important in hafting, fishing, and seafaring. Dating to 52–41 thousand years ago, the cord fragment is the oldest direct evidence of fibre technology, although 115,000-year-old perforated shell beads from Cueva Antón possibly strung together to make a necklace are the oldest indirect evidence.^[35][280] In 2020, British archaeologist Rebecca Wragg Sykes expressed cautious support for the genuineness of the find, but pointed out that the string would have been so weak that it would have had limited functions. One possibility is as a thread for attaching or stringing small objects.^[339]

The archaeological record shows that Neanderthals commonly used animal hide and birch bark, and may have used them to make cooking containers, although this is based largely on circumstantial evidence, because neither fossilizes well.^[285] It is possible that the Neanderthals at Kebara Cave, Israel, used the shells of the spur-thighed tortoise as containers.^[340]

At the Italian Poggetti Vecchi site, there is evidence that they used fire to process boxwood branches to make digging sticks, a common implement in hunter-gatherer societies.^[341]"[20]

In a similar manner, despite facing multiple indictments, Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump continues to posture that he is a winner, despite evidence he is major loser, "Male chimpanzees exist in a linear dominance hierarchy. Top-ranking males tend to be aggressive even during dominance stability.[85] This is probably due to the chimpanzee's fission-fusion society, with male chimpanzees leaving groups and returning after extended periods of time. With this, a dominant male is unsure if any "political maneuvering" has occurred in his absence and must re-establish his dominance. Thus, a large amount of aggression occurs within five to fifteen minutes after a reunion. During these encounters, displays of aggression are generally preferred over physical attacks.[85][86]".[2][10]

Collectively, this nearly perfectly describes Donald Trump, who never attacks anyone himself, but displays deceptive aggression instead of attacking others, in order to trigger the mirroring, mimicry, and imitation learning function of those people he has deceived into supporting him, largely by employing what is known as defensive projection (victim blaming by reversing who is the victim and who is the violator) and where he also does so by employing mimicking, mirroring, and imitating  group language similar to "I am being indicted for you", "radical left trying to steal from you", "radical left trying to destroy OUR great country", and by doing so he also triggers the chimpanzee aggression genes for territory and dominance, and where primates are known to deceive others to get what they want, and like humans learn by repetition and imitation, which Trump banks on to deceive others.[2]

Specifically, "Former Trump White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham recalls a moment when former President Donald Trump told her, "As long as you keep repeating something, it doesn't matter what you say"", instructing her his method of deceiving others, and where clearly someone taught him applied psychology so that he could weaponize the same and use it to deceive others, is a reasonable inference. [13]

The same is reminiscent of Carl Sagan's and Ann Druyan's fantastic journey through the minds of primates, in their book, Shadows of Forgetten Ancestors, where one part of the book describes a chimp study, where a known sociopath in a chimp troop, is shown a small cluster of bananas in a maze by an altruistic leader, and of course the sociopath hoards all of those bananas to himself, during which time, the altruistic leader chimp brings the troop of chimpanzees to a much larger cluster of bananas, where they can all eat in peace away from the hoarder. [12]

Similarly, the International Criminal Court, U.S., and UK Commonwealth governments and processes have been coming after Putin, Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, the GOP, and/or their shared criminal orbit, which explains why they have been using deception in order to engineer a "critical mass" to evade prosecution, prison, the death penalty, significant liability, and the total seizure of all of their assets, which they are now pouring into public corruption, bribery, and propaganda channels, desperate to evade the same. From a legal and existential perspective, they are literally fighting for their survival and the survival of their families, after decades of ongoing organized crimes that killed other people's families.[14]

Accordingly, they have turned to deception to manufacture the violence that would keep them in power or alpha position over the primates in the human jungle.

The problem for them is that evidence and their own people keep turning on them, and this is exposing all of their lies and deception, to be further exposed with their prosecution, and which may eventually lead to a firing squad, electric chair, or lethal injection, if they weren't able to legitimately engineer enough organized crime syndicate into enough corrupted public offices and/or if they weren't able to deceive enough people to overthrow the country, which seems to be waning. 

It seems their best chance at not being executed and having all of their assets seized is their corruption of SCOTUS, who themselves face major public scrutiny and can be replaced or diluted any time by POTUS, or by other mechanisms, including but not limited to Congress. This plan may fail because some of the most conservative constitutional scholars in the country, members of the Federalist Society, who hand-picked 6/9 SCOTUS specified preemptively that self-executing laws exist that "immediately disqualify" those who violate the laws Trump and/or others have violated.

Average human beings don't need to "alpha" everyone, they don't need to rape or torture kidnapped or retarded children, they don't need to threaten violence, nor engage in violence -- because that's what savages in the jungle do -- and so average human beings are found much higher on the spectrum of primate behavior, towards behaviors that are known as cooperation, mutual respect, fairness, charity, tolerance, forgiveness, civility, harmony, and grace.

Closing with where we began -- gaze into the eyes of a big, dumb, white ape named Snowflake -- and ask yourself, do you see Donald Trump somewhere lost in those dead eyes?