THE IMPORTANCE OF PROTECTING THE UNIQUE PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY OR SPIRITUALISM OF OTHERS
To begin, UpRights News is a firm believer that the personal philosophy or spirituality of every person is sacred, and as such, we do not believe that any one group should force their personal philosophy or spirituality on any other group, but rather, we believe that every person should have the freedom to explore spirituality on their own, without the aggressive influence of others seeking to recruit them for any purpose.
For this reason, and due to our understanding of imperial cults and cults of personality, we completely oppose any attempt to merge church and government, because the same results in spiritual oppression, where the ruling party, sometimes a fake royal dictator, for example but not limited to Octavius Gaius (rebranded Augustus Caesar) forces others to believe that they and their family members are God (Julius Caesar), the son of God (Octavius), and that they and their friends are divine, and as such need to be worshiped, the end game of networked malignant narcissists (people who can't stop themselves from being selfish), sociopaths (people who can't stop themselves from violating the laws or rules other people must follow for social cohesion, and who may murder others to self-serve), Machiavellians (people who can't stop themselves from deceiving others to get what they want), dark triad personality types (a combination of some of these personality types), sadists (people who can't stop themselves from enjoying inflicting harm on others), kleptomaniacs (people who ca, obsessive compulsive hoarders, and/or organized crime, who devolve democracies into kleptocracies, then oligarchies, then monarchies, then theocracies, and eventually imperial cults, whose hypocrisy and abuse of power eventually results in revolution.[4]
We also realize the danger and hypocrisy of our statements here, because it could easily be argued that we ourselves express our own philosophy in a manner that others who don't share our philosophy would thus find harmful, in conflict with our beliefs that others should be free to explore their spirituality.
We reconcile the same with our disclaimer found at the bottom of every article we publish, and we address the same in some of our other articles, where we specify our researched opinions are just that, opinions, and that others are free to read our opinions as they are free not to.
More simply, we aren't financed by billionaires constantly trying to evade criminal prosecution, and we aren't organizing cults or clubs in high schools and universities, like Russia's GOP, and/or Jeffrey Epstein's and NXIVM's child sex crimes organized crime syndicate's orbit-financed Turning Point USA, Project Veritas, Fox News, and/or others have been doing under the auspices of the GOP/RNC and/or their current and/or former operators and/or financiers, seemingly trying to brainwash your children into not prosecuting them, but instead supporting their "core values", nor are we trying to force a merge between the church and government to force you to believe what we believe.[4]
But rather, we ask questions, and then we research information that might or might not provide some insight as to the answers to those questions, which are themselves researched opinions based on our own spiritual journey and exploration of spirituality and personal philosophy, as to what is real and what isn't real, and what is good and what isn't good or evil.
More simply, we propose that our researched opinions are what others should consider in their own research as to what is real and what is true, in a "what if manner", versus a "this is the only way it is manner".
This is why freedom of speech and freedom of religion or spirituality is so important, because we should all be able to express our own philosophy of religion or spirituality, without fear of persecution.
Furthermore, what is good and evil and what is true and false is difficult if not impossible for any person or organization to determine, based on the conflict inherent in ethics or moral relativism -- best illustrated by Nietzsche's lambs and birds of prey observation -- where Nietzsche's specified the moral relativism of what could be judged as good or bad as relative, "“There is nothing very odd about lambs disliking birds of prey, but this is no reason for holding it against large birds of prey that they carry off lambs. And when the lambs whisper among themselves, 'These birds of prey are evil, and does this not give us a right to say that whatever of the opposite of a bird of prey must be good?', there is nothing intrinsically wrong with such an argument - though the birds of prey will look somewhat quizzically and say, 'We have nothing against these good lambs; in fact, we love them; nothing tastes better than a tender lamb.”[6]
What Nietzsche elucidated was one of many flaws, paradoxes, fallacies, and/or conflicts regarding passing judgement on the same situation, when perceived from the angle of different stakeholders, born out of the difference between objective reality, what is real, and subjective reality, what each of us has "faith" is real.
Nietzsche allows us to see there is a conflict in what is perceived as true or false and good or evil for the same situation, which makes it difficult to impossible to know the same as follows.
It is true that when a bird of prey kills a lamb that this is good for the bird of prey, because it survives.
It is true that when a bird of prey kills a lamb that this is evil for the lamb, because it doesn't survive.
It is false that when a bird of prey kills a lamb that this is good for the lamb, because the lamb doesn't survive.
It if false that when a bird of prey kills a lamb that this is evil for the bird of prey, because the bird of prey survives.
It is true that when a bird of prey kills a lamb that this is good for the rest of the lambs, who can eat more grass between them.
It is true that when a bird of prey kills a lamb that this is evil for the rest of the lambs, who now have a greater chance of being eaten by a bird of prey.
It is false that when a bird of prey kills a lamb that this is good for the rest of the lambs, because this increases the chance of extinction for all the lambs.
It is false that when a bird of prey kills a lamb that this is evil for the rest of the lambs, because this increases the chance of survival for all of the lambs, who now have increased access to resources like grass.
Returning, is it true or is it false that it is good or evil when a bird of prey kills a lamb?
From a subjective and objective perspective, it can be argued that it is both true and false and good and evil when a bird of prey kills a lamb, which makes it awfully difficult to assign the labels true, false, good, and evil to really anything.
This is also how UpRights News is different from the likes of what Russia's GOP, and/or Jeffrey Epstein's and NXIVM's child sex crimes organized crime syndicate's orbit-financed Turning Point USA, Project Veritas, Fox News, and/or others have been doing -- under their auspices and/or under the auspices of the GOP/RNC and/or their current and/or former operators and/or financiers -- because we tell you there is a spectrum of belief, faith, science, information, perspective, truth, and judgement -- whereas these and/or others who seek to manipulate you to follow and worship them like sheep, don't tell you there is a spectrum of belief that is both good and evil and true and false.[4]
Instead, employing what is known as "active measures" or polarization, they'll migrate to the right or to the left of the political, religious, scientific, or spiritual spectra, and they'll try and convince you that their way of framing all of the same, is more-or-less the only way you should be looking at the world, their self-serving way.[4]
Furthermore, they will attack the other side of these spectra to double influence you that their self-serving propaganda is the only way you should look at the world, and the only way you should conduct yourself, and the only way you should lead your life, in order to worship and serve them.
Returning to the birds of prey and lambs, they are the birds of prey who want you, the lambs, to believe they and you and they are the "good" victims of "evil", after they eat "good" you and "good" others alive in an "evil" manner.
And anyone trying to educate "good" you as to their ongoing "evil" organized crimes against "good" you, and/or any "good" person, investigator, and/or government trying to hold "evil" them accountable are the "evil" ones, who "good" you and "evil" them need to "destroy" to save "evil" them from "good" prison sentences, lawsuits, and/or the death penalty, which "evil" them perceives as "evil" from their perspective, and that any "good" evidence that can prove their "evil" is "true" is to be considered by "good" you to be "false", not "true", "fake news", and/or "evil".
Because humans and other primates learn by repetition, mirroring, mimicry, and imitation, the more you hear or expose yourself to their self-serving double-polarized propaganda, and the less you expose yourself to information outside of their self-serving narrative, the more you'll find their self-serving propaganda false and evil.[4]
This is precisely why they are in high schools and colleges and why they spend so much money on marketing, to repeat their double-polarized propaganda to you over and over again, while discouraging you, your kids, and others from leaving the manufactured universe of evil lies and misinformation, to control your worldview so that you worship and serve them.
They are in effect creating a double-polarized filter or information tree that they need everyone in the world to subscribe to in order to manufacture the "critical mass" required to keep a few hundred to a few thousand families in full-spectrum dominance over 8 billion people, so that they can perpetuate an ongoing organized crime syndicate that may be hundreds of years old, if not thousands of years old back to the imperial cults of the Egyptian and Greek Pharaohs, and Greek and Roman empires.[4]
And it is true and false that this is evil and good for them and for those they oppress, as many of our other articles specify and elucidate -- but unlike them -- we will let you know both sides of the spectrum exist, so that you have the religious or spiritual freedom to explore and develop your own more balanced religious, spiritual, or personal philosophy -- so that you are not limited to just being spoon-fed double-polarization propaganda, in order to worship them like and as God(s) [remember when Russia's and Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump and/or his supporters claimed he was the Second Coming of God/Jesus?], to defend them from criminal prosecution for decades of ongoing organized crimes.[4]
We want to create a path of freedom to believe based on a path of freedom to information (versus banning books and burning books, to conspiring to uproot education systems to revise history and bury evidence of decades to centuries of organized crimes).
We want to create a path of freedom from oppression to allow others to be free to share ideas, without forcing the same on others or limiting freedom of information like self-serving dictators, imperial cults, and cults of personality would do, while screaming for their "God-given" freedom to oppress, exploit, and/or murder others in the name of God, while literally taking the Lord's name in vain.
The Abrahamic religions' concept of the "Messiah" is one who saves or liberates an oppressed people.[5]
Unlike Russia's and Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump, we won't claim we are Jesus, the Second Coming of God, but that doesn't mean we don't want to help our country and the world liberate or save others and/or ourselves from self-serving people like Trump, Putin, the GOP, and/or others, who it seems would love to put us all in squalor rape cages along the border for their self-serving pleasure, murder, and/or exploitation.[4]
As those funded by Jeffrey Epstein's orbit's Donor "Trust" have specified, and as Trump himself has specified, and/or implied, he is the gatekeeper, and/or savior of Western Civilization, but where our research proposes that he is the gatekeeper and/or savior of outdated imperial cults based on cults of personality, and where anyone researching either or both imperial cults and/or cults of personality would understand what we mean here. [4]
Briefly, imperial cults and cults of personality are when one person or a group of people convince(s) others that they need to be the leader(s) of everyone, and that as the leaders they need to be worshiped daily and forever as God(s), and/or as divine, despite often totally rejecting the core teachings and values of the religions they weaponize in order manipulate others to serve them and their endless needs.
Another way to look at imperial cults and cults of personality -- like the one Russia's GOP, Jeffrey Epstein's Donald, Donor Trust, and/or others have been "engineering" -- is like a failed billionaire experiment's engineering of "perpetual mommy" by "perpetual children"(them) -- who don't want to do anything (or not much) for themselves, and who want everyone else to do everything for them (with exceptions), whenever they throw a crybaby tantrum (which is often), or else --they used their ill-got wealth from decades to centuries of ongoing organized crime, but not limited to the same, to polarize natural differences in populations using active measures, DARVO, techniques of neutralization, Cialdini's principles of influence, and other psychological manipulation, terrorism, organized crime, treason, sedition, insurrection, and/or elections fraud -- in order to engineer what their "perpetual crybabies" want right now, or might want later -- specifically to evade historical, criminal, and/or civil investigations, prosecutions, liability, and/or the death penalty, to be able to perpetuate their ongoing organized crimes, crybaby tantrums, and worship by those they have deceived -- or else, expect more crybaby tantrums about how they are being treated "so unfairly" (by being held to the same standards as everyone else), if there are denied what they want right now (shame on us for not serving these worshipful masters faster, better, and often at no cost or a lower cost to them).[4]
Accordingly, when the "king" of the crybabies, Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump, and/or the organized crime syndicate of child trafficker Putin's GOP, wails that he and/or they are the "defenders" of "OUR great country", Western civilization, and the like, they don't mean the country and civilization of you and I, but rather, they are defending their decades to centuries stranglehold and oppression of those they have deceived and oppressed to serve their endless crybaby needs.[4]
Because it is THEIR world that is coming crashing down with all of these overlapping criminal investigations, and now more than ever they need others to support them to form the "critical mass" required for them to remain in power over their own criminal investigations and lawmaking complex -- or else if treated to the same standards as everyone else -- they would most certainly be removed from power, prosecuted to the full extent of the law, without any special treatment "privileges" or "immunities", and then face multiple life sentences, total seizure of all of their assets, enormously just liability, and/or the death penalty.
That's what they are defending and want you to defend, decades to centuries of lies, in order to deny you freedom of religion, freedom over your body, freedom over your economic security, and freedom to equal pursuit of life, assets, justice, and happiness. Those are "privileges" that are reserved for them alone.
As Universalist Unitarians (and swing voters) -- who allow for the broadest possible interpretation of faith and spirituality -- in such a manner that Christians, Jews, Muslims, agnostics, atheists, and spiritual scientists are all welcome in the temple of Universalist Unitarians -- we begin with this disclaimer above, and at the bottom of every article we publish, to let you know that we do respect the worldview of others, including readers whose narrow worldviews we don't exclusively subscribe to and/or might offend, and where that isn't our goal.
Our goal as "truth seekers" is to not just share information via the Socratic, Scientific, and 10th Man methods, and to provide context to the same, but to balance the same with an understanding of the full-spectrum nature of the truth, which can be hard to do without being a hypocrite, as the truth is that the truth can be false at the same time that it can be true.
With that knowledge, each of us can be free to pursue our personal philosophy or spiritually free from their double-polarized oppression, and with that freedom, we can pursue other liberties, while their foul flower wilts under the temperature and pressure of the closest and stronger star.
THE MISSING DINOSAURS IN ABRAHAM'S BOOK OF GENESIS, THE TORAH, THE BIBLE, AND THE QURAN
The following is a cut and paste of God's calendar, interpreted from the Book of Genesis, which doesn't specify that God created dinosaurs, but does specify that God created creatures a day before God created humanity, which could be spun as a reference to dinosaurs, but to be clear there really isn't any specific references to dinosaurs in any of the Abrahamic holy books, and the reason for this is that archaeology wasn't really developed as a science until after the holy books were written, heavily edited, revised, accepted, and/or rejected by every different branch of the Abrahamic religions.[3]
Other than no specific reference to dinosaurs, who existed tens to hundreds of millions of years prior to human beings -- making the "day before" calendar problematic as a candidate for the "truth" concerning creation and our origins -- God "blessed" the creatures he created the day before to be fruitful and to multiply.
Except, there have been six mass extinction events on Earth, one of which the fossil fuel industry seems to be leading based on Russia's and Jeffrey Epstein's criminal orbit's failed billionaire experiment -- which seems to refute the notion that all creatures were blessed to be fruitful and to multiply -- which by default doesn't seem to be true, and if true, then there would still be dinosaurs a day later through to the present day, but there weren't and there aren't, and there was no reference to the dinosaurs for hundreds to thousands of years later, until the birth of archaeology, and interest in bones of creatures found throughout the sands of time.
Some researchers have concluded that birds and reptiles are what are left of the dinosaurs after some celestial object plunged into the Earth near Cancun, Mexico some 65 million years ago -- and then about 65 million years later -- humans roamed the Earth, so not exactly the next day on the calendar of creation.
In some of our other articles, we reference religious scholars who have identified 100-200 other discrepancies in the holy books of Abraham.
Similarly, we explore how the same could be possible if an all-powerful and perfect God inspired the holy books, and where we explore world history from the perspective of claims that God is all-loving, all-seeing, all-powerful, and perfect, given that the world is so full of hate and seemingly imperfect, and that our perfect, loving, and all-powerful God hasn't fixed the same since at least the time of the dinosaurs -- in our personal search for the truth as part of our own spiritual pilgrimage.
And though we still pray (nearly) daily to the God(s) of Abraham and Jesus -- despite no one having come to save us from a harsh world that resembles a jungle, since the time of the dinosaurs, Abraham, and Jesus -- we question along this spiritual journey if we and others have succumbed to an imperfect, non-loving, not all-seeing (though the failed billionaire experiment of child trafficker Putin and/or Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate is close to the same), and/or not all-powerful (though the failed billionaire experiment of child trafficker Putin and/or Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate is close to the same) imperial cult's cult(s) of personality?[4]
