THE ZEITGEIST FILMS REMIND US THAT MANY OF THE SAME PEOPLE, FAMILIES, COMPANIES, AND GOVERNMENTS INVOLVED IN FORMER CRIMINAL CONSPIRACIES, ARE ALSO INVOLVED IN THE MORE RECENT ONES, AND WHERE THE EVIDENCE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT PROVING THE SAME, IS SPUN BY THOSE BEING ACCUSED AS A FRIVOLOUS CONSPIRACY, WHICH IN FACT IS A DEFENSIVE PROJECTION
One of the key motivators of UpRights News launching this investigative journalism site was a movie by filmmaker Peter Joseph known as Zeitgeist: The Movie.
Here's the official link to the movie series, https://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/watch-now and you'll note that we do cover a lot of the same types of topics as the Zeigeist movies, and with good reason.
It's always the same people, organizations, and countries involved in the world's most harmful situations, has been our researched observation, but operating different major crimes together, in between which they obstruct justice for the crimes they have operated, often in a two prong manner, the first projecting their crimes onto others, and the second corrupting enough public offices to help them evade accountability, and our research has found that this strategy largely works in a manner that allows their broader organized crime syndicate to continue their operations, every once in a while convicting a few of the operators of the same, but where under Merrick Garland, more operators have been prosecuted that arguably any other time in U.S. history, including Trump and Giuliani, but not limited to the same.
The analogy here is that if the same people and vehicles keep being found outside of banks and inside banks before, during, and/or after the banks are robbed, a statistical pattern forms, which makes it increasing improbable that those people aren't bank robbers, and increasingly more probably that those people are bank robbers.
Our analogy continues with the bank robbers, because sometimes there are more than one witness to the bank being robbed and identify the same people involved in the bank robberies over and over again.
Sometimes there are videos of the bank being robbed by the same bank robbers, who at other times have been caught on video specifying they would rob other banks, which then were robbed by them later, with evidence they were there.
Here, we renew a concept that we have explored in other articles, the difference between frivolous conspiracies and legal conspiracies, and where frivolous conspiracies simply don't have sufficient evidence to prove legal conspiracies, evidence of at least two people, families, organizations, and/or countries conspiring to harm at least one other person, family, organization, and/or country.
Some critics have smeared the Zeitgeist films as frivolous conspiracy, but we invite everyone to watch the same. They provide a lot of evidence and experts to support their claims, which makes it difficult for reasonable people not to believe the same.
This leads us to believe that those who are involved in legal conspiracies employ frivolous conspiracy defensive projections to deceive others into not investigating legal conspiracies, by claiming that evidence of their crimes is a frivolous conspiracy against them, a claim by them which in fact is a frivolous conspiracy, because the same is refuted by the evidence against them.
Returning to the bank analogy, the bank robbers, involved in a criminal legal conspiracy, employ frivolous conspiracy defensive projections, specifying that those witnesses, investigators, and camera companies who can prove their criminal conspiracy, are simply furthering a frivolous conspiracy, to cover-up for their ongoing criminal conspiracy.
That's what our research into all of these same people, families, organizations, and/or countries leads us to reasonably believe.
A good example of the same is the "Big Lie" involving Rudy Giuliani and Donald Trump, where each of them has specified in an ongoing frivolous conspiracy that a criminal conspiracy to rob Trump and/or the GOP of the 2020 elections exists, but despite over 60 failed lawsuits, and repeated claims by them both of massive evidence providing the same, no massive evidence of the same has ever surfaced, which proves a frivolous conspiracy by them to cover-up a criminal conspiracy by them, further supported by the fact that when Trump, Giuliani, and/or the GOP were largely in control of the entire or large parts of the U.S. government, that government under their control and/or influence decided to investigate them instead, because that what the massive evidence supported.
Furthermore, if they had such evidence, they could simply post it on one of the major social media sites their ongoing organized crime syndicate operates, but instead, zero. All bark and no bite.
Furthermore, Trump, Giuliani, the GOP, and/or their overlapping ongoing organized crime syndicate have implied that anyone who has evidence of their crimes is part of a frivolous or criminal conspiracy against them, which in fact is in itself a frivolous conspiracy, because the same has no substantive basis.
Accordingly, just like the bank robbers, Trump, Giuliani, the GOP, and/or their overlapping organized crime syndicate have been repeating over and over that the elections were stolen and that evidence exists for the same, despite the actual evidence providing that they tried to steal one or more elections.
More simply, frivolous conspiracies have been used to cover-up criminal conspiracies by those involved in the criminal conspiracies, to help those who have been involved in the criminal conspiracies evade historical, criminal, and civil prosecutions, liability, and/or the death penalty, but not limited to the same, because they also seized control of the government, and the same resulted in changes to the government, which they don't want nullified, because the same allows their ongoing organized crime syndicate the ability to expand their crime syndicate and expand their ability to evade accountability for the same.
Returning to the Zeitgeist films, they specify some fantastic evidence for a lot of different historical crises and frivolous conspiracies used to cover-up criminal ones, and what's really interesting is that they make reference to some of the same people involved in recent criminal conspiracies, before those people became in the most recent criminal conspiracies.
The first Zeitgeist film, produced in 2007, makes reference to, but not limited to, the roles of Rudy Giuliani and Robert Mueller III in the 9/11 crises facing America and the fallout, for which the public has learned a great deal more with hoards of classified information that have been released since the 9/11 Commission, which the first Zeitgeist film ridicules with evidence debunking almost all of the central conclusions, in what makes the 9/11 Commission Report seem irrefutably like a frivolous conspiracy, covering-up a criminal conspiracy, is a reasonable inference based on 16 years of more evidence released by the Biden administration, which had been blocked by the Trump administration.
The first Zeitgeist film provided evidence that supported that the Republican Party's G.W. Bush, Robert Mueller III, Rudy Giuliani, and/or others were involved in a cover-up of a criminal conspiracy involving the Saudi's Bin Laden family, which filmmaker Michael Moore was able to prove had business relationships with the Bush family in the film Farhenheit 9/11.
The first Zeitgeist film also provided evidence that the Bush family was also involved in treason crimes as far back as WWII, linked to Standard Oil, whose derivative companies like Chevron, were also implicated with the Bush family in the 9/11 crises.
The first Zeitgeist film also provided evidence of false flag operations to rob Americans in different ways, including via the Federal Reserve lending fraud and/or by involving the United States into WWI, WII, Vietnam, Iraqi, and Afghanistan wars -- largely involving in an expressed or implied manner Standard Oil organization(s), the Rockefeller family, JP Morgan, the Bush family, and/or Freemason presidents Teddy Roosevelt, Howard Taft, FDR, Truman, and/or Lyndon B. Johnson.
The film also specifies a testimonial 11 months before 9/11 by filmmaker Aaron Russo, who interviewed Nicholas Rockefeller who specified in advance of 9/11 that the same was going to happen in much of the same way it unfolded, and specified why, to be able to invade specific countries that were invaded, and to take rights away from people, which also did happened.
Our research supports these findings, and links many of these same people, organizations, and/or countries in still more organized crimes.
For example, but not limited to the same, we found the Rockefeller family named in the client of Jeffrey Epstein, and we found that JP Morgan Chase was part of Jeffrey Epstein's child kidnapping, sex trafficking, and child rape operations with Jes Staley, but not limited to the same.
Our research has revealed that JP Morgan has organized financing for Trump's (who specified on 9/11 that his building was now the tallest, and whose family are now business partners with 9/11's Saudi royals) and the Bush family's GOP, who helped the Bin Laden family escape America on 9/11.
Jeffrey Epstein's nearly 1971 named global elite included 9/11's Saudi royals, the GOP's Fox News' Rupert Murdoch (who helped call the election for the Bush family engineered by the Bush family and GOP in 2000, and who furthered Trump's "Big Lies"), Donald Trump, his family, David Rockefeller, the UK royals, and/or so many other people.
Our research has found that Charles III received over a million dollar "donation" from the Bin Laden family, in the context his brother Prince Andrew was named in the book of Jeffrey Epstein, along with many other UK and EU royals, JP Morgan, Trump, Murdoch, Rockefeller, and/or others.
G.W. Bush's Robert Mueller, who was part of Donald Trump's golf club, didn't prosecute Trump for crimes linked to rape crimes with Jeffrey Epstein (and Trump has since repeatedly accused of raping children and others), nor did he prosecute most of the other 1971 clients and associates in Jeffrey Epstein's "black book", including Rupert Murdoch, JP Morgan's Jes Staley, the Rockefeller's, whose Chevron also financed the GOP.
Thereafter, the GOP hand-picked Robert Mueller to investigate and not prosecute Trump and the GOP for crimes against America again with America's number one enemy, Russia.
Returning to the bank robbery analogy, it seems the same people named in the first Zeitgeist movie and across our investigations are often involved in the same and later other major crises harming America and the American people, who can be viewed as the bank robbers, and the getaway drivers.
The bank robbers are those who actually rob the bank. The getaway drivers are who help the bank robbers get away with the loot and the crimes they have committed.
The bank robbers are generations of the same global elite families involved in a failed billionaire experiment that needs immediate government intervention.
The getaway drivers are the corrupted public offices that are installed to allow the bank robbers to continue to rob banks and to get away with the same most of the time, instead of intervening to protect America and Americans from harm by the same, and when caught, the corrupted public offices or getaway drivers prevent prosecution of the organized crime syndicate to minimize the criminal and liability exposure their organized crime members will face, if any.
Peter Joseph, Thom Hartmann, Michael Moore, Marcy Wheeler, and/or others do a good job elucidating what former prosecutor Glenn Kirschner has specified is a criminal ruling class, and where our reporting supports their findings, and further elucidates that it is almost always the same people and their families robbing the bank, murdering people at the bank, and driving the getaway cars, generation after generation, and who rarely get caught, and when caught rarely get prosecuted, and when prosecuted rarely go to prison, and when imprisoned often get pardoned and/or clemency from the organized crime syndicate members, and when not pardoned and/or provided clemency, then provided significantly reduced sentences, in a manner that only encourages more organized crime and harm against America, the American people, U.S. law enforcement, U.S. lawmakers, and U.S. troops, generation after generation.
We don't think most people are anti-government, and we certainly are not, but like most people we are against corrupt government leadership and corrupt government employees, who allow these networked crime families to evade criminal prosecution generation after generation, in an ongoing betrayal and harm to their country and people.
We applaud the likes of Merrick Garland, Special Counsel Jack Smith, Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg, Letitia James, Dana Nessel, Ariel Smith, the bipartisan January 6, 2021 Committee, the Biden-Harris Administration, and/or others who shed light on these networked crime families, and their organizations, and attempt to hold them accountable, even if not fully accountable.
We respect that the GOP's Robert Mueller also did shed some light on the same, and that the likes of the Mayflower Hotel's Jeff Session's Rod Rosenstein and/or G.W.H. Bush's William Barr limited the scope of what could be investigated under the illegitimate authority of Donald Trump, the GOP, and/or others.
We are truly shocked that the same people and organizations can operate ongoing organized crimes, often in public view, generation after generation, and that hundreds of millions of people can't or won't hold them accountable despite the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt of their ongoing involvement.
Humans are naturally problem solvers, but how is this situation ever going to be solved if those paid to stop the same won't stop the same in such a manner that allows more of the same to continue generation after generation?
America and the world need more heroes to stop these and/or other ongoing organized crime families.
As with all of our news content, the same is subject to our general and specific disclaimer below.