Is Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate poisoning and killing us all with products and pollution made from fossil fuels in another murder-for-profit conspiracy?

MICROPLASTICS IN OUR FOOD, WHEN HEATED, CREATE REALLY TOXIC FUMES AND CARCINOGENS

Plastics are made from fossil fuels.[2]

Next time you go to the store, see if you can escape without any plastic products at all, and you will find that this task is almost impossible.

Almost all of our food is either wrapped in plastic, bagged in plastic, vacuum-sealed in plastic, steeped in water with plastics, in a plastic net, in a plastic bottle, in a plastic dish, in plastic wrap, in a metal can with a plastic liner, and though we were once taught that plastic is "inert" or doesn't interact with other things to cause any harm, the truth of the matter is that it isn't inert, and it's really harmful to your health, the health of your children, and to the health of the global food chain -- leaching "forever molecules" that bioaccumulate in our food and in our bodies, and which are known to effect reproductive health, hormone disruption, and cancer. 

As reported by Melba Newsome at www.sciencenews.org, "For decades, chemicals that make life easier — your eggs slide out of the frying pan, stains don’t stick to your sofa, rain bounces off your jackets and boots — have been touted as game changers for our busy modern lives. “Better things for better living … through chemistry,” was the optimistic slogan coined by DuPont, the company that invented the widely used chemical coating Teflon.

But this better living has come at a cost that is getting new attention. These chemicals — dubbed forever chemicals for their ability to last in the environment — are proving to have a lasting impact on human health. A growing body of research links the group of chemicals broadly known as PFAS, short for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, to conditions from unhealthy blood lipid levels to pregnancy complications to cancer.

Alarm about the health impacts of these chemicals has sparked a recent flurry of action from U.S. public health and regulatory officials. Warning that PFAS pose a greater health risk than previously thought, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in June dramatically lowered its recommended safe levels of the chemicals in drinking water.

“The updated advisory levels are based on new science, including more than 400 recent studies which indicate that negative health effects may occur at extremely low levels, much lower than previously understood,” Radhika Fox, assistant administrator of the EPA’s Office of Water, said in June at the Third National PFAS Conference, held in Wilmington, N.C.

Soon after, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine released the first clinical guidelines quantifying blood concentration levels of PFAS that could put someone’s health at risk. The 300-page report urges clinicians to recommend regular blood tests for anyone exposed to high levels of the chemicals and to provide information on how to limit exposure, such as installing special filters known to reduce PFAS in drinking water.

In the United States alone, by one measure, the tally in medical care costs and lost productivity from PFAS exposure linked to five medical conditions adds up to at least $5.5 billion annually, researchers at New York University reported July 26 in Exposure and Health. Those conditions include low birth weight, childhood obesity, hypothyroidism in women, and kidney and testicular cancers.

“We only looked at two of the more than 9,000 chemicals in the PFAS family, so we’re just seeing the tip of an iceberg,” says Leonardo Trasande, a pediatrician and environmental health expert at NYU Langone Health.

PFAS are found in many products, including:

Ubiquitous chemicals

Among those most at risk of exposure are firefighters: PFAS make protective gear more water resistant, and the chemicals are found in a widely used fire suppressant foam. But most people have some measurable level of PFAS in their bodies, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Exposure typically comes from ingesting PFAS-contaminated drinking water or food grown in soil treated with fertilizers made from sewage contaminated with the chemicals (SN: 11/24/18, p. 18). An estimated 2,854 locations across the United States have PFAS contamination.

“People and communities have had significant exposure to these chemicals. If they can ID that they are in an area of significant exposure, they should seek testing through their usual source of care,” says Ned Calonge, an epidemiologist at the Colorado School of Public Health in Aurora who chaired the committee that wrote the National Academies report. The committee linked PFAS exposure to a slightly different list of conditions than the NYU team, finding “sufficient evidence” linking PFAS to four conditions: poor antibody response to vaccination, abnormally high cholesterol levels, decreased infant and fetal growth, and kidney cancer. Evidence was “suggestive” for breast and testicular cancers, as well as thyroid problems and ulcerative colitis, an inflammatory bowel disease.

The report calls for more research into the health effects of PFAS, noting gaps in evidence on everything from neurological issues to bone density. These chemicals have a wide range of impacts on multiple systems in the body, Calonge says. And they’re “ubiquitous in the environment.”

Newer, not safer

PFAS have been produced in the United States since the 1940s. Because they are good at repelling oil and water, holding up at high temperatures and reducing friction, the chemicals became useful for a vast array of products, including carpeting, upholstery, food packaging and even dental floss. Yet, relatively few of the 9,000 or so versions of these synthetic chemicals have been studied for their toxicologic effects.

Many PFAS are now recognized as endocrine disruptors, chemical compounds that interfere with the normal functioning of the endocrine, or hormonal, system. But PFAS have other effects that can boost cancer risk, such as weakened immunity, excessive cell growth and altered gene activity. One study found a greater than twofold increase in kidney cancer risk between people with the highest versus lowest blood levels of one common PFAS called perfluorooctanoic acid, or PFOA, researchers reported in 2021 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

A newer generation of PFAS was assumed to be safer because the chemicals are less likely to accumulate in the body. But these newer compounds are structurally similar to the older ones and can be just as harmful to health as their cousins, Trasande says. These newer molecules “are increasingly being associated with diseases like gestational diabetes. We’re just starting to see the bigger problem that might be at play.”

The EPA’s new drinking water advisory aims to tackle both old and new PFAS. It targets two of the earlier and most commonly found kinds of PFAS in the environment: PFOA and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, or PFOS. The advisory reduces the level of drinking water contamination below which adverse health effects are not expected from 70 parts per trillion to 0.004 and 0.02 ppt, respectively. Those levels are based on routine exposure to them over a lifetime.

The EPA’s health advisory also provided the first-ever recommendations on two of the newer kinds of PFAS: hexa­fluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and HFPO ammonium salt, collectively known as GenX chemicals, and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid, or PFBS. The agency set the drinking water safety threshold at 10 ppt for GenX chemicals and 2,000 ppt for PFBS. These newer chemicals have similar persistence in the environment, the agency states.

Health impacts

A National Academies panel found sufficient and suggestive evidence that PFAS boost risk for several ailments. 
* in adults, † in children

Sufficient evidence

• Poor antibody response to vaccination *†
• Abnormally high cholesterol levels *†
• Decreased infant and fetal growth
• Kidney cancer *

Suggestive evidence

• Breast cancer *
• Liver enzyme alterations *†
• Pregnancy-induced hypertension *
• Testicular cancer *
• Thyroid disorders *
• Ulcerative colitis *

Consumers can ask their municipal water provider for data on PFAS testing in their area. Testing is becoming more common, and providers should be able to list which PFAS they test for. Private wells can be contaminated with PFAS if they are near manufacturers that produce or use the chemicals, as well as airfields where PFAS are used for firefighting, firefighting training areas and some waste disposal sites. People with private wells near one of these facilities can get their water tested. The EPA is giving grants to help underserved small and disadvantaged communities provide household water quality testing and comply with drinking water regulations.

PFAS price tag

Because there are limited available data on the health effects of the newer generation of chemicals, the NYU and National Academies reports focused on the impacts of older PFAS.

First, the NYU team examined PFAS chemicals in blood samples obtained from roughly 5,000 adults and children who participated in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Then, based on earlier studies linking PFAS to certain diseases and models that estimate medical costs and lost worker productivity for these illnesses, the team came up with its PFAS price tag.

Childhood obesity, the largest contributor to the overall economic toll of PFAS exposure, costs about $2.7 billion a year, the team estimates, followed by hypothyroidism in women at $1.26 billion. When the researchers considered other PFAS-linked diseases beyond the top five, such as endometriosis, obesity in adults and pneumonia in children, the estimated economic burden rose to as much as $63 billion annually.

Assessing risk

The National Academies report focused in part on how to curb that toll by providing testing guidelines to clinicians to detect high levels of PFAS in the body and try to reduce exposure.

The report provides the first clinical guidelines on how to assess a person’s disease risk. A person with a PFAS blood concentration of less than 2 nanograms per milliliter doesn’t have to worry. But for patients with blood concentrations between 2 and 20 ng/mL, clinicians should screen for conditions like unhealthy levels of fat in the blood, which can lead to heart problems. Such screening is especially important for people more vulnerable to the effects of PFAS exposure, like children, pregnant people and those who are immunocompromised. For anyone who tests above 20 ng/mL, the report encourages routine screenings for some cancers, thyroid problems and ulcerative colitis.

“For almost 20 years, we’ve been able to measure PFAS in people’s blood, but there was no guidance to say what [those measurements] mean,” says National Academies report coauthor Jane Hoppin, who heads the Center for Human Health and the Environment at North Carolina State University in Raleigh. “For the first time, this actually sets some ranges, some guidance for what could be levels of concern, and what kinds of health follow-up might be appropriate.”

She hopes that the recommendations will increase testing availability and make both doctors and patients more aware of these chemicals and their health risks. The report also encourages doctors to work with their patients to figure out where they are being exposed to PFAS and how to mitigate those risks, by cutting down on PFAS-containing products and filtering water.

Activated carbon filters, found in some countertop or pitcher filters, don’t remove PFAS as completely as reverse osmosis filters, researchers at Duke University and North Carolina State reported in 2020. The National Academies report offers a link to NSF, a testing organization that offers technical details on which filters actually filter out PFAS.

Efforts like reducing PFAS in drinking water could help. While EPA’s health advisories are recommendations and not enforceable, Trasande is pleased that the agency acted quickly, particularly on newer chemicals like GenX. But he argues that in light of what we already know and are continuing to learn about the disease burden caused by these chemicals, PFAS should undergo more testing before they are approved. Better yet, they should be regulated by class instead of taking what he calls a whack-a-mole approach.

“Our environmental policy still takes a wait-and-see approach that we should wait 20 to 30 years, which is the time that people take to develop diseases due to chemical exposures,” he says."[3] 

Is fossil fuel-based plastics pollution the new healthy and refreshing cigarette?

It turns out the same lies the tobacco industry used to sell tobacco products, for example, and paraphrasing that tobacco was healthy and refreshing, actually caused lung cancer.

Are plastic and fossil fuels the new tobacco, a murder-for-profit conspiracy between billionaires who bribe our politicians to continue the use of the same, despite the very harmful effect on human and other life?

Studies have found that microplastics in the water and the air are now found raining down in areas that have little to no people.[4]

The way this works is that plastic is dumped in the ocean, forming the likes of the near continent size floating mass of product known as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. There it dissolves into microplastics, plastics that are so small you need a microscope to see this plastic.[6] 

The ocean water evaporates, and carries the tiny microplastics into the air we breath, which then rains down onto remote areas, where there are no people, and now remote lakes where there are no people, have been found to have plastics in those lakes.

This evaporated microplastics water then ends up in our drinking water and the water to grow food.

We later drink plastic water and/or boil the same, to ensure a solid dose of microplastics nearly daily and/or throughout the day.

Research has proven that microplastics can now also be found in our lungs, because of the likes of this evaporated ocean plastic, but also due to the likes of carpets, which breakdown into microplastics also.[5]

The plastics bleed out all sorts of nasty chemicals, some that can pretend to be human hormones, disrupting how our bodies function, causing illness, cancer, and death -- because we are breathing plastics that get stuck in our lungs, leading to lung disease, and we are eating plastics that get stuck in our gastrointestinal system, and the same results in "forever molecules" and all sorts of nasty molecules leaching into our blood.[8]

Other research proves that we eat and drink about a credit card worth of microplastics every week, and record numbers of younger people are developing colon cancer as a result of eating all of these hormone disrupting and toxic microplastics.[7]

When our meat, soy sauce, and/or other foods that have been pressed into plastic wrapping, plastic trays, plastic bags, and/or which have marinated in plastic containers, bottles, and the like, are heated past a certain temperature, the same creates extremely toxic fumes you can't see, that enter your breathing air, along with the nasty cancer causing products released by burning gas inside your home without a vent on.

Research has proven that people who use gas stoves and other gas appliances are getting sick and cancer, and also sorts of other diseases.[8]

It isn't much different that running your car in your garage, which can literally kill you, and where in addition to the carcinogens that enter your breathing air, the carbon dioxide, CO2, and carbon monoxide, CO, produced by burning fossil fuels inside your home, for example every time you bake, literally compete with your blood cells for oxygen.

Said differently, the more you bake or cook with a gas stove without ventilating you are literally reducing your ability to breath, because the invisible gas released can connected to your blood cells where oxygen is supposed to connect.

More simply, the more you bake or cook with a gas stove, the less you can breathe, and the greater chance you have of developing a devastating disease like cancer.  

Accordingly, even though you can't taste the same, nor smell the same, you are killing yourself by superheating microplastics you can't see, pressed into your food, like your chicken, steak, or fish, fried in oils whose temperatures can superheat to well beyond the scorching temperature for the microplastics in your food, and slowly, you are poisoning and killing yourself faster and faster, every time you food, or drink food, that has been superheated, and if it hasn't been superheated, then you are poisoning yourself with the leaching of forever molecules into your body.

Most plastics have a melting point range in the 200-300 ℃ range.[10]

Most cooking oils start to smoke in the 300-500 ℃ range [11].

What this means is that the microplastics you can't see in your food, like meats, vegetables, and other foods that touched plastics, plastic containers, plastic squirt bottles, are scorched and create very nasty toxic molecules and carcinogens, every time you cook, which you then eat, which eventually can make you sick and kill you. Welcome to death by plastic, gas stoves, and cancerous fossil fuels products and pollution.

So we are breathing fossil fuel pollution in the form of toxic gases and microplastics, we are eating fossil fuel pollution that touches our food, and our clothes are also made of plastic, for example polyester, and then we brush our teeth with plastic. We are literally sick and tired due to plastic.[12]

FOSSIL FUEL ENERGY PRODUCTION AND CANCER

Despite all the evidence that making and using fossil fuels is very harmful to life on Earth, because of rank politics, our primary energy source are fossil fuels and almost everywhere on Earth, largely in the form of oil, gasoline, and coal.

A total of 79% of U.S. energy is based on fossil fuels, and the U.S. population is the 3rd largest population in the world.[13]

The manufacturing and use of the same releases enormous amounts of very toxic pollution, which enters the air we breath, the water we drink, the air and water used for growing our food, and the soil used to grow our food, and as a result, cancer rates are much higher where fossil fuel are processed, for example, in Louisiana there is an area known as  Cancer Alley, in the region where 25% of fossil fuels in the U.S. are produced.[14] 

Cancer rates in fracking areas are also much higher than in areas where there is no fracking, and that's because the fracking water contaminates drinking water.[15]

In addition to the Yale fracking study, Harvard has also found the link between fossil fuels and cancer.[15][16]

Then there is the CO2 released into the atmosphere which increases the greenhouse gases, which act as a sort of solar blanket that gets thicker and thicker over time, making the world hotter and hotter, and where changing the global temperatures by 2 to 5 degrees could kill the bottom of the food chain in the oceans, which then would destroy the ocean food chains we rely on, and an increase in temperature can change and even destroy the current ocean currents and their circulations of hot and cold and fresh and saltier water currents which the ocean food chains and we rely on, and is contributing to the 6th mass extinction of all life on Earth, caused by human industrial activities and the resulting pollution and climate change.

So there is no denying it, fossil fuels, their products, and their waste cause humans to get sick and die.

If fossil fuels are so toxic that they make us sick and die, then why not switch to non-renewable resources like wind farms, solar, hydroelectric, Sterling motors/generators, magnetic generators, Telsa coils, or nuclear energy?

Because at least three companies make $700 billion per year selling fossil fuels. Below is a list of the current Fortune 500's top richest companies, 3 of whom are fossil fuel companies, ranked 6th, 9th, and 16th. 

Another way to say this is that 1/5 of the top 10 richest companies in the United States are fossil fuel companies, and so they want to keep on making as much money as possible, and they are not going to let the death of most species on Earth, nor the savage sickness and deaths of Americans and others, stand in the way of their billions.

But can't the government stop them?

The government can totally stop them, but our investigations have revealed that at least 13/20 of these companies have financed the Republican Party, which is more than half of the richest companies in the U.S. bribing our politicians.

Bribery is impeachable behavior as specified right in the Constitution, and also behavior that "immediately disqualifies" those engaged in the same from public office, per the Constitution -- but the reason this bribery is allowed is because Republican Mitch McConnell and Citizen's United -- whose leader was part of Trump's 'leadership' circle -- and the Federalist Society financed by oil billionaire David Koch of Jeffrey Epstein's black book, conspired to allow Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate of billionaires to bribe U.S. politicians, via the illegitimate SCOTUS Citizen's United ruling, which made every SCOTUS judge who plotted to rule for the same in an unlawful manner immediately ineligible for public office.

Then they conspired to allow dark money bribery, so hidden money from billionaires to bribe the government, and since then most if not all of the GOP SCOTUS judges have further disqualified themselves from public office by allowing billionaires and others to bribe them, and then heard over 30 billionaire cases for them after being bribed by them. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se, this natural evil speaks for itself.

In fact 6/9 GOP SCOTUS judges were hand-picked by Jeffrey Epstein's David Koch's Federalist Society.

Jeffrey Epstein's David Koch is a fossil fuel billionaire, and David Koch isn't the only global elite profiteering off deadly fossil fuels, who was named in the operational black book of Jeffrey Epstein's clients, financiers, friends, and associates, as David Rockefeller from Standard Oil, which became Exxon Mobile and Chevron were also named in Epstein's black book.

Above is David Koch and below is David Rockefeller named in Jeffrey Epstein's client and associates book. Does that mean that the orbit of child kidnapper, child rapist, and child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, who financed the Federalist Society, is who financed the hand-picking of 6/9 SCOTUS judges, and the same ones involved in organized crimes, bribery, and the wholesale of the law of the United States to the billionaires, including fossil fuel billionaires? Yes, that is exactly what happened and is happening. 

Fortunately, the Attorney General for the District of Columbia is investigating their middleman, Leo Leonardo, and Congressman Sheldon Whitehouse and others are investigating overlapping matters, and Congressman Ron Wyden is investigating overlapping matters as is the Attorney General for the Virgin Islands.

But no one else in Jeffrey Epstein's orbit is also found in a leadership position in any of these other top 20 richest companies, right? Wrong. AT&T was named on page 93 and controls most of the communications in the United States.

Okay. But no one else on this list of the 20 richest companies is associated with Jeffrey Epstein, correct? Wrong again. Here's a story about Jeff Bezos of Amazon, Sergey Brin of Google/Alphabets, and the richest man in the world, Elon Musk, with Jeffrey Epstein, who all converged to meet with almost immediately after he was convicted of prostitution with a 14 year old kid, after he kidnapped children, sex trafficked them, for the global elite to rape and sodomize (allegations against Leon Black, who owns much of Marissa Mayer's Yahoo, who is currently being sued for raping a kid with Down Syndrome and autism, trafficked to him via Epstein, and who allegedly brutally rape this child with objects and sodomized her to the point of causing her to bleed). 

But that's it right? There aren't any more of the richest companies linked to Epstein, right? Because otherwise that would start to form what is known in statistics as a pattern. Something that occurs so much that it can't possibly be random, and thus has to be significant.

Wrong again, because Bill Gates was a known client and/or associate of Jeffrey Epstein, and flew around in Epstein's private plane, and financed initiatives Epstein told him needed financing, per https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7350469/Bill-Gates-flew-Jeffrey-Epstein-Loliota-Express-2013-years-pedophile-prison-stay.html?__twitter_impression=true

Any more? Surely there can't be even one other of these richest companies being led by a client or associate of Jeffrey Epstein can there? The name Tim Cook, corresponding to the same name as the leader of Apple, is found below under Jeffrey Epstein.

Now in Mr. Cook's defense, unlike Bill Gates (Microsoft), Reid Hoffman (LinkedIn), Elon Musk (Paypal, Tesla, Spacex),  Marissa Mayer (Yahoo), Leon Black (Yahoo), Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook/Meta), Sergey Brin (Google), Larry Page (Google), and/or others,  we weren't readily able to find Tim Cook of Apple linked to Epstein in other articles, nor payments between him and Epstein, and so this may be a different Tim Cook is a reasonable possibility, or not, given Epstein's obsession with developing relationships with or blackmail against most of the other California big tech leaders, so a question mark remains over Tim Cook for these reasons.

What do Amazon, Paypal-Spacex-Tesla, Yahoo, Microsoft, Facebook, Meta, AT&T, Alphabet, and/or Google and/or their leaders have in common, other than being linked to a child rapist and sex trafficker?

Our research has readily found that at least 12/20 companies above have regularly financed the organized crimes of Jeffrey Epstein's and Russia's GOP and Trump unlawful power grabs, usurping of public offices they aren't eligible for, giving them platforms to deceive the American people, giving them platforms to organize to overthrow the United States, and their crimes against the country, and where but for bribery of government officials, many of these organized crime members in public offices may not have been "engineered".

Our research has readily found that some of these companies target perceived enemies of Jeffrey Epstein's and Russia's Donald Trump and GOP with regular harassment, which includes failing to protect online accounts, cyberbullying, censoring, toggling, failing to prevent cyberterrorism, regularly being implicated in Russia's cyberterrorism and cyberwarfare against the United States.

And last but not least, their businesses need a lot of energy, which releases a lot of pollution. And what kind of energy do they mostly use, fossil fuels that enrich others linked to Jeffrey Epstein on the list above.

Warren Buffet of Berkshire Hathaway is also an orbiter of Jeffrey Epstein via his relationship with Bill Gates.

Collectively, that a lot of the world richest companies and richest people linked to a child kidnapper, child sex trafficker to the global elite, who have been accused by victims of child rape, child sodomy -- including sex trafficked children with Down Syndrome and autism, whose lawyers are accusing this orbit of so brutally raping children and sodomizing them with objects as to leave them bleeding, only to refuse to rush them to the hospital to coverup their brutal crimes against children.

Returning, there is more than one reason America and the world continue to use fossil fuels that cause wars, destroy a healthy living environment, destroy life on Earth,  result in inflation (because this energy sources is a non-renewable energy source, and most of the world's society has been engineered to depend on the same, and so the more fossil fuels run out or are perceived as going to run out, the more expensive everything will become, which when coupled to near flat wage increases slowly turns everyone into economic slaves) -- beyond making a profit at the expense of the lives of others and life on Earth -- and that reason is that very sick people have networked together, and created a culture of sickness, and they are so sick that they are unable to stop themselves from harming others to hoard more assets, which is why so many different branches of the government are intervening, as they should, as they would for obsessive compulsive hoarders, other murderers, and the like.

Many of these companies and/or their leaders linked to child sex traffickers have also been linked to slave labor, child labor, and/or prison labor, which is ugly, but not at all surprising.

People like this, whose networked sociopathy, sadism, Machiavellianism, narcissism, kleptomania, and obsessive compulsive hoarding results in so much harm to others, are not that different from extreme drug addicts, in that they simply can't stop themselves.

They simply lack that capacity or cognitive function in any significant manner. They don't know how not to be like this and when they see they can bribe themselves out of almost situation, this results in them just getting uglier. 

Unlike the "radical right" they finance, we don't propose that their throats be slit, nor for them be destroyed, but we do believe that the government needs to intervene to protect the people who pay for the government from being harmed by these people who can't stop themselves from harming others and bribing and influencing our government not to intervene.

Though the expression holds true, "you get what you pay for" -- always true in America -- "you also get what you don't pay for" -- armies of homeless people and populations who lack the resources required to survive, increasing their desperation, increasing crime to access the resources required to survive, and generally decreasing the quality of life for everyone, including now the billionaires who complain about the homeless in California's big cities, which they themselves have engineered by corrupting our governments and destroying our society, in order to profit off the same, and hoard more assets than they can ever use in their lives, which they use as weapons against anyone trying to check, slow, stop, hold accountable, and/or elucidate their networked and criminal mental illness. Broken people breaking everything.

Excessive wealth is a weapon, but to balance, fascist and organized crime and terrorism attempts to overthrow the government, would be difficult to defend against without large assets, and from this perspective, power is decentralized, but balancing further, not really, using the examples of John McAfee, Jeffrey Epstein, and/or Jean Luc Brunel, whose massive wealths weren't able to prevent them from being "suicided", or murders spun as suicides by those covering up the murders in conspiracies to do so, employing frivolous conspiracies to coverup legal conspiracies, and then further spinning the legal conspiracies as the frivolous conspiracies, as was also done on 9/11, despite clear and abundant (presented in the film Zeitgest: The Movie) evidence and testimonies supporting a drastically different narrative than the GOP's 9/11 Commission report, which omitted key and extremely important evidence in order to "engineer" a revised and false reporting of the actual events, which also happened in the GOP's Mueller and Durham investigations, revisionist and obstructive attempts to pitch frivolous conspiracies as legal ones.[16][17]

All of this in the context that William Barr was in charge of the justice system when Epstein was killed, and where it was William Barr's father, Donald Barr, who is the person who groomed and trained Epstein, and where Robert Mueller was in charge of the justice system after 9/11, and yet didn't champion significant material evidence that was omitted, only to do the same with Trump and Russia, and where Barr had helped cover up the Iran Contra treason of G.H.W. Bush and Reagan, in what only looks like ongoing organized crime covering up for ongoing organized crime.

Similarly, it was under Mueller's justice system that 1,971 people named in Jeffrey Epstein's black book weren't investigated and prosecuted, including Donald Trump, and where William Barr's law firm is who worked on Epstein's criminal case, and then later Mueller wouldn't properly investigate and prosecute Trump again, under the auspices of William Barr. Res ipsa loquitur malum in se, this natural evil speaks for itself. 

In the case of Epstein, all sorts of checks and balances, as many as 10, had to fail in order for him to be killed before testifying. An independent autopsy revealed that the nature of the fracture in his neck was entirely consistent with homicide by strangulation.[17]

In the case of McAfee, he specified that he wouldn't kill himself, and if found suicided that he had been murdered, and Spanish authorities specified that he was found suicided in his cell thereafter.

As with all of our articles we publish at UpRights News, this article also is subject to our legal disclaimer below.