UpRights News wasn't shocked to learn that under the regime of Jeffrey Epstein' Trump, engineered into power by U.S. enemy, Russia, that all 50 states allowed adults to marry minors to get away with child rape, for kids as young as a 1 year old.
To learn more, we found https://www.unchainedatlast.org/laws-to-end-child-marriage/, which provides some truly shocking statistics, summarized by visual maps.
Since the Trump administration, about 10 states have changed their laws to protect children, with about 40 states resisting protecting children from sexual predators, is a fact, and explains a lot regarding why Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein's Bill Clinton have been installed into power over the rights of children.
We tried to find some general trends regarding this data, and really only found that those states most seeking to protect children were largely found around the Great Lakes region, further broken down into the Mid-West and Northeast regions, as follows.
The following map from Unchained at Last, illustrates in red, the only states who have passed laws prohibiting adults from marrying minors, and where pink has laws for marriages at 17, blue 16, yellow 15, and black, the most shocking of all have no age limit for children to be married to adults, zero.
Looking for a political or religious pattern, we didn't find any. Because even though the states that protected minors the most in the Mid-West and Northeast were largely Democratic and Catholic states, so were those states failing to protect children the most, as illustrated by the 2020 elections map, and a map of Christian distribution across America, below.
That said, the maps above prove there is a geographic distribution pattern that emerges where the Democratic Catholic West Coast and to a lesser extent, the Republican Protestant American South, fail to protect children from child marriages the most, and where most of the states who allow minors to marry at 17 are Republican, and again where the states that protect kids from marrying the most are Democratic Catholics in the Mid-West and Northeast.
The following map breaks down how Christians are distributed across America.
Similarly, the average IQ per state also didn't really elucidate any glaring contributing factors to child marriages, though a quick glance at these maps above and below propose that Republican Southern Baptist Protestants had among the lowest IQs, making them the most susceptible to the propaganda of Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate and orbit, and where relative to most other states, they seemed to protect children from child marriages less (but protected children more than Catholic Democrats out West, but less than Catholic Democrats in the Mid-West and Northeast), which would explain their support for Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump.
Average income didn't appear to significantly play a role in child marriages, though a pattern that does emerge here is that those most protecting children from child marriages had slightly more moderate to lower income, and similarly, those states with some of the highest reported incomes protected kids from marriage less, but with exceptions for both.
Accordingly, there aren't many glaring political, religious, income, and/or geographic indicators that correlate to one another supporting why most American states support the marriage of children, other than perhaps the map regarding religious distribution, which if taken all by itself proposes a strong correlation between not protecting children from child marriages and being Christian, and which the following The Hill article in part addresses, and which Jeffrey Epstein's Leon Black's Yahoo was quick to distribute, https://news.yahoo.com/child-marriage-still-legal-most-100000904.html.
This article specifies that Republican Christians want to children to get married for religious reasons, and specifies that Democratic rights groups want children to have the freedom to marry if it suits them, and that these may be the two most significant drivers of the marriage of children.
Not considered above is the primatological genetics driver of this sort of behavior, which we have addressed in at least one other article, https://www.uprightsnews.com/african-mutterland/1435577_how-does-comparative-primatology-explain-the-crime-syndicate-of-child-trafficker-vladimir-putin-s-russia-and-jeffrey-epstein-s-prince-andrew-leon-black-and-donald-trump-how-are-they-the-same-and-how-are-they-different-than-savages-in-the-jungle
Briefly, we share about an equal percentage of DNA with two different types of primates, the Chimpanzee and Bonobo pigmy chimp, roughly sharing 99.6% of our DNA with each of them - and where their documented behavior is very similar to the documented behavior of Jeffrey Epstein's Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein's Leon Black, Jeffrey Epstein's Prince Andrew, and Jeffrey Epstein's Prince Solman and/or Salman - which proposes that we are simply a bunch of savages living on a spinning rock in a curious sort of concrete jungle, where the most vicious and deceptive animals lord over all others, in a manner that allows them and/or others to marry children - with half of the beasts in this curious jungle waiting for an invisible savior born out of Octavius Gaius' Roman (Egyptian via Alexander the Great) Imperial Cult to "save and protect us from God's perfect design" some 2,023 years later - an invisible savior who was unable to save and protect himself from being nailed to lumber, hung in the air, and left to rot to his death - because God is all-powerful, all-seeing, and loves each and every one of us like his own children, and equally.
And if you don't believe the same, then allegedly by default, you are the evil one behaving like a radical. Wow.
Photo: https://unsplash.com/@rodlong