Jeffrey Epstein's David Koch's Federalist Society's and Iran Contra's treasonous G.H.W. Bush's Clarence Thomas caught in yet another bribery scheme for about a quarter of a million dollars.

Published on 27 October 2023 at 07:03

 

Clarence Thomas has been caught in yet another bribery scheme, this one worth over a quarter of a million dollars, multiple news outlets have reported, including but not limited to, New York Times, who reported that Thomas, who previously been caught receiving similar "concealed bribes", which proves a pattern of intent, had a $267,230 "RV loan" forgiven by Anthony Welters – which tax expert says ‘made no logical sense’ – was forgiven in 2008, but never declared the same as he was required, to conceal the quarter million dollar bribe to him, which further proves his intent.[1][2]

Cornell Law summarizes 18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses, as follows, and note Section (1) "an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof", and note Section (2) on "receiving", and Section (4) on "disqualifying" that person from public office, and where Sections (3) specifies this body of law applies to "ANY court" and "any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit",

"(a)For the purpose of this section—

(1)

the term “public official” means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror;

(2)

the term “person who has been selected to be a public official” means any person who has been nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed; and

(3)

the term “official act” means any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit.

(b)Whoever—(1)directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—

(A)
to influence any official act; or
(B)
to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or
(C)
to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person;

(2)

being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:

(A)
being influenced in the performance of any official act;
(B)
being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or
(C)
being induced to do or omit to do any act in violation of the official duty of such official or person;

(3)

directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony under oath or affirmation of such first-mentioned person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or with intent to influence such person to absent himself therefrom;

(4)

directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for being influenced in testimony under oath or affirmation as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in return for absenting himself therefrom;

shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

(c)Whoever—(1)otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty—

(A)
directly or indirectly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official; or
(B)
being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;

(2)

directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;

(3)

directly or indirectly, demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both.

(d)Paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (b) and paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (c) shall not be construed to prohibit the payment or receipt of witness fees provided by law, or the payment, by the party upon whose behalf a witness is called and receipt by a witness, of the reasonable cost of travel and subsistence incurred and the reasonable value of time lost in attendance at any such trial, hearing, or proceeding, or in the case of expert witnesses, a reasonable fee for time spent in the preparation of such opinion, and in appearing and testifying.

(e)The offenses and penalties prescribed in this section are separate from and in addition to those prescribed in sections 15031504, and 1505 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 87–849, § 1(a), Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1119; amended Pub. L. 91–405, title II, § 204(d)(1), Sept. 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 853; Pub. L. 99–646, § 46(a)–(l), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3601–3604; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §§ 330011(b), 330016(2)(D), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2144, 2148.)

This is yet another perfect example of U.S. law not being applied in an ongoing RICO conspiracy after the Iran Contra treason conspiracy in order to illegitimately install a SCOTUS 'justice', who was never eligible to change any laws, who thereafter illegitimately changed laws that everyone else has to follow, during which period that illegitimate SCOTUS failed to follow the law in a manner that would further disqualify him from public office, but his violations of the laws that would disqualify him again from public office are being ignored again here, so that he can continue to illegitimately change the law everyone else has to illegitimately abide by in what ruling after ruling continues to manufacture an illegitimate government with illegitimate laws demanding that all of the same be considered legitimate and self-refusing to be removed from office despite violating the laws that disqualified him. 

All of the same mirrors the Privilegium maius-forged royal claims of the UK/EU royals whose predecessors were not qualified to be the monarchs of England, but who ignored those laws to claim they were legitimate, then made up illegitimate laws to pretend and oblige others into accept their legitimacy, also known as usurping of power in an illegitimate manner, and where any evidence to the contrary fails as fruits of the poison tree of illegitimacy, stare decisis, a priori, and/or a fortiori.

All of the same makes a total mockery of the rule of law, in a "do as I say and not as I do" manner, and in a manner that allows others to operate above the law, and allows others to be their own judge, and in doing so totally destroys the basic principles of democracy and rule of law to allow this ongoing organized crime syndicate harming America since WWII to fester and wreak havoc and chaos on over 300,000,000 people in the United States, paying for legitimate government, and not paying for illegitimate government, constantly seeking to overthrow the United States, including in this ongoing lawfare spoke of the ongoing conspiracy to do the same.

And yet the man who hand-picked Clarence Thomas in a conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein's David Koch's Federalist Society, G.H.W. Bush - whose father, Prescott Bush, was a traitor with the Nazis in WWII - was knowingly involved in the Iran Contra treason conspiracy, but lied about the same to not be impeached to be able to illegitimately install Clarence Thomas in an illegitimate manner thereafter, who has proven time and time again that he (Thomas) cannot be trusted with the public's trust, and regularly violates bribery laws, is what reporting over the last two years has repeatedly proven.

 

 

More specifically, "In 2004, the Los Angeles Times reported that Thomas had accepted gifts from Harlan Crow, a wealthy Dallas-based real estate investor and prominent Republican donor—notably a Bible, valued at $19,000, that once belonged to abolitionist Frederick Douglass, and a bust of Abraham Lincoln valued at $15,000.[357][358] Crow also gave Thomas a portrait of the justice and his wife, according to the painter, Sharif Tarabay. Crow's foundation gave $105,000 to Yale Law School, Thomas's alma mater, for the "Justice Thomas Portrait Fund", tax filings show.[359]

In 2011, Politico reported that Crow gave $500,000 to a Tea Party group founded by Thomas's wife and that Thomas had failed to report her income on his disclosure for more than a decade.[360] Also that year, the advocacy group Common Cause reported that between 2003 and 2007, Thomas failed to disclose $686,589 in income his wife earned from The Heritage Foundation, instead reporting "none" where "spousal noninvestment income" would be reported on his Supreme Court financial disclosure forms.[361] The next week, Thomas said the disclosure of his wife's income had been "inadvertently omitted due to a misunderstanding of the filing instructions".[362] He amended reports going back to 1989.[363]

In April 2023, ProPublica reported that Thomas had "accepted luxury trips virtually every year" from Crow for two decades and failed to report them. They included flights on Crow's private jet, cruises on Crow's superyacht at locations around the globe, and stays at Crow's private resort in the Adirondacks and the private club Bohemian Grove.[359][364] The Ethics in Government Act requires justices, judges, members of Congress and federal officials to annually disclose gifts they receive.[365] Many elected officials criticized the appearance of impropriety, given Crow's donations to conservative causes and Republican candidates, and his service on the Board of Trustees for the American Enterprise Institute and the Hoover Institution, which have filed amicus briefs before the Supreme Court.[366][359]

Also in April 2023, ProPublica reported that one of Crow's companies bought a house and two empty lots on a residential street in Savannah, Georgia, for $133,000 in 2014. The properties were owned in equal parts by Thomas, his mother, and the family of his deceased brother. Thomas did not report the sale on the disclosure form he filed for 2014. Crow's company also paid for extensive renovations of the house, where Thomas's mother still lives.[367]

In May 2023, ProPublica reported that Crow had paid for private school tuition for Thomas's grandnephew, Mark Martin, of whom Thomas had legal custody. Thomas did not report the payments on his financial disclosure forms, while ethics law experts said that they were required to be disclosed as gifts. A bank statement[368] showed that monthly tuition at Hidden Lake Academy, one of the two schools Crow paid for, was $6,200. Mark Paoletta, a longtime friend of Thomas, said that Crow paid for one year each at Hidden Lake and Randolph-Macon Academy, which ProPublica estimated to total around $100,000.[369]

On the same day, The Washington Post reported that in January 2012 conservative judicial activist Leonard Leo had Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway's polling firm bill the Judicial Education Project $25,000, which her firm then paid to Ginni Thomas's firm, Liberty Consulting, for a total of $80,000 between June 2011 and June 2012. Leo instructed Conway not to mention Thomas's name on the paperwork. The documents the newspaper reviewed did not indicate the nature of the work Thomas did for the Judicial Education Project or Conway's company. In 2012 the Judicial Education Project filed a brief to the Supreme Court in a landmark voting rights case.[370]

In 2023, The New York Times reported that a friend had paid for Thomas's Prevost Le Mirage XL Marathon RV, purchased for $267,230 in 1999 (roughly equivalent to equivalent to $469,000 in 2022). Anthony Welters, a former UnitedHealthcare executive and a close friend, lent Thomas the purchase price. In response to a Senate inquiry, Welters revealed that the loan was discharged in 2008, forgiving much of the original balance. A bank would have been unlikely to offer such a loan, given the Marathon's high capacity for customization, which can make used models difficult to appraise. Thomas had previously said that he "had scrimped and saved to afford the motor coach", according to the Times, and a friend, Armstrong Williams, said that Thomas had told him that "he saved up all his money to buy it". When the loan was forgiven, Thomas was required to disclose the money as a gift.[371][372][373][374]

In August 2023, Thomas filed his financial disclosure report for 2022, listing three trips on Crow's jets.[375][376]"

It's the garbage-in-garbage-out fake royal Habsburg model, where when organized crime who has been illegitimately installed by way of crime into government remains in public office, then expect more crime like RICO corruption and obstruction until removed from public office, and if never removed from public office, then expect carnage and corruption of the government thereafter, resulting in the likes of Citizen's United and dark money bribery rulings so that those corrupting public offices can corrupt the same some more for them and for those bribing them to corrupt the government, isn't just a reasonable inference. This is all ongoing proof of the same. For what collectively equates to about a million dollars in bribes, Clarence Thomas sold out America to organized crime, and he didn't do it alone, but in a conspiracy with others.

If democracy is a wall meant to defend the majority of people, then Clarence Thomas and Jeffrey Epstein's crime syndicate's and/or orbit's David Koch's Federal Society's SCOTUS are the weakest points in the wall, because they crumbled with little pressure, sold us all out, and have let the enemies in, who are laying waste to our democracy, in what could also be described as sedition, treason, and insurrection by the GOP's corrupted SCOTUS, using illegitimate lawfare or the law unlawfully to overthrow the United States in this other way, overtly furthering the criminal conspiracy by Trump, Russia, and insurrectionists to do the same, via this spoke of that ongoing conspiracy.

Shame on all of them for living at birth, only to betray their country and their people thereafter, resulting in a shameful country that is both despised and the laughing stock around the whole world. The only people who can stop them, won't, because they are either cowards and/or crooks. Shame on all of them for living at birth as well, only to betray their country and their people thereafter.

What a shameful and embarrassing corruption of government we have due to all of this organized crime. To clarify, few people hate their government, but almost everyone except for organized crime and traitors hates corrupted government officials and employees.

You are an embarrassment - but the truth is - you likely always have been. It's your nature. You can't help but be losers, as you have always been losers, and you have always been threatened by winners, who are coming for you, and now have you surrounded, flipping on you daily.

 

Unite the left and the right against Jeffrey Epstein's billionaires' fight.